RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deliganis, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Deliganis, A. V.
Right arrow Articles by Mann, F. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal Radiology
Right arrow Neuroradiology
Right arrow Emergency Radiology
(Radiographics. 2000;20:S237-S250.)
© RSNA, 2000


Spinal Column

Radiologic Spectrum of Craniocervical Distraction Injuries1

Anastasia V. Deliganis, MD, Alexander B. Baxter, MD, Julian A. Hanson, MB, BChir, David J. Fisher, MD, PhD, Wendy A. Cohen, MD, Anthony J. Wilson, MB, ChB and Frederick A. Mann, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195-7115 (A.V.D., D.J.F.); and the Department of Radiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Wash (A.B.B., J.A.H., W.A.C., F.A.M., A.J.W.). Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1999 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 2, 2000; revision requested March 13 and received April 25; accepted April 28. Address correspondence to A.V.D. (e-mail: adeliganis@hotmail.com).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
Injuries to the atlanto-occipital region, which range from complete atlanto-occipital or atlantoaxial dislocation to nondisplaced occipital condyle avulsion fractures, are usually of critical clinical importance. At initial cross-table lateral radiography, measurement of the basion-dens and basion–posterior axial line intervals and comparison with normal measurements may help detect injury. Computed tomography (CT) with sagittal and coronal reformatted images permits optimal detection and evaluation of fracture and luxation. CT findings that may suggest atlanto-occipital injury include joint incongruity, focal hematomas, vertebral artery injury, capsular swelling, and, rarely, fractures through cranial nerve canals. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the cervical spine with fat-suppressed gradient-echo T2-weighted or short-inversion-time inversion recovery sequences can demonstrate increased signal intensity in the atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital joints, craniocervical ligaments, prevertebral soft tissues, and spinal cord. Axial gradient-echo MR images may be particularly useful in assessing the integrity of the transverse atlantal ligament. All imaging studies should be conducted with special attention to bone integrity and the possibility of soft-tissue injury. Atlanto-occipital injuries are now recognized as potentially survivable, although commonly with substantial morbidity. Swift diagnosis by the trauma radiologist is crucial for ensuring prompt, effective treatment and preventing delayed neurologic deficits in patients who survive such injuries.

Index Terms: Spine, anatomy • Spine, CT, 31.1211 • Spine, dislocation, 31.42 • Spine, fractures, 31.41 • Spine, injuries, 31.41, 31.42 • Spine, MR, 31.12141, 31.121413 • Spine, radiography, 31.11


    LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST 6
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
After reading this article and taking the test, the reader will be able to:


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
Osteoligamentous injuries at the craniocervical junction are uncommon but are of critical clinical importance. Injury to the upper cervical spine occurs frequently in fatal motor vehicle accidents, particularly among pedestrians and motorcyclists (1). Likely mechanisms include violent distractive hyperflexion or hyperextension with or without associated rotation. In one series of over 100 consecutive victims of fatal motor vehicle accidents, cervical spine injuries were present in 23% of cases, with nearly half of these injuries localized to the occiput-C1 region (2). Other series estimate that up to 20% of all traffic fatalities involve upper cervical spine injuries (3,4). Cervical spine injuries (including up to 50% of craniocervical injuries) are frequently missed at initial imaging in survivors of high-speed accidents. This can be an important factor in subsequent morbidity, with up to one-third of affected patients experiencing later neurologic deterioration (5).

In this article, we review the normal anatomy of the craniocervical region and the use of radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the evaluation of this area. We also discuss and illustrate various patterns of craniocervical injury, including atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial distraction, neurovascular injury, and pediatric atlanto-occipital dislocation.


    Normal Anatomy and Imaging Approaches
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
The articulations of the craniocervical junction are defined by the middle atlantoaxial joint, which consists of two synovial compartments that surround the dens and allow rotation of C1 and C2 with respect to each other, and the paired lateral atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital articulations. These joints are bound and supported by several ligaments, including the anterior longitudinal ligament, the anterior atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital ligaments, the cruciform ligaments, the alar ligaments, and the tectorial membrane, which extends cranially as the cephalic extension of the posterior longitudinal ligament (Fig 1) (6). Structures that are critical for maintaining craniocervical continuity include the tectorial membrane, the alar ligaments, and the transverse fibers of the cruciate ligament (eg, the transverse atlantal ligament). Any of these ligaments may fail from avulsion, fracture of the bone attachment, or intrasubstance tear.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a. Normal anatomy of the craniocervical region. Drawings illustrate the articulations of the axis, atlas, and skull (sagittal view) (a), the median atlantoaxial joint (superior view) (b), the principal part of the tectorial membrane removed to expose the deeper ligaments (posterior view) (c), and the cruciform ligament removed to show the deepest ligaments (posterior view) (d).

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b. Normal anatomy of the craniocervical region. Drawings illustrate the articulations of the axis, atlas, and skull (sagittal view) (a), the median atlantoaxial joint (superior view) (b), the principal part of the tectorial membrane removed to expose the deeper ligaments (posterior view) (c), and the cruciform ligament removed to show the deepest ligaments (posterior view) (d).

 


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c. Normal anatomy of the craniocervical region. Drawings illustrate the articulations of the axis, atlas, and skull (sagittal view) (a), the median atlantoaxial joint (superior view) (b), the principal part of the tectorial membrane removed to expose the deeper ligaments (posterior view) (c), and the cruciform ligament removed to show the deepest ligaments (posterior view) (d).

 


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1d. Normal anatomy of the craniocervical region. Drawings illustrate the articulations of the axis, atlas, and skull (sagittal view) (a), the median atlantoaxial joint (superior view) (b), the principal part of the tectorial membrane removed to expose the deeper ligaments (posterior view) (c), and the cruciform ligament removed to show the deepest ligaments (posterior view) (d).

 
Craniocervical biomechanical continuity depends on the integrity of the skull base, atlas, and axis and their attaching ligaments. Most trauma patients initially undergo cross-table lateral radiography. Further imaging options include conventional tomography, CT with coronal and sagittal reformatted images, MR imaging, and dynamic imaging (Table 1). Each of these studies should be conducted with special attention to bone integrity and the possibility of soft-tissue injury (Table 2). Normal measurements have been determined for many of the bone relationships and soft-tissue contours at the craniocervical junction and are valuable for excluding upper cervical spine injury (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Protocols for Imaging Evaluation of Suspected Upper Cervical Spine Injury
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Guidelines for the Imaging Assessment of the Craniocervical Junction
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Normal Dimensions of the Craniocervical Junction at Lateral Radiography
 
Harris et al (7,8) have identified a practical method for evaluating the normal osseous relationships at the craniocervical junction using lateral conventional radiographs obtained at a 1-m target-film distance with the cassette positioned against the skull (7,8). They determined the upper limits of normal for adults and children by measuring the basion-dens interval (tip of dens to basion) and the basion–posterior axial line interval (basion to posterior axial line, a vertical line drawn along the posterior aspect of the subdental body of C2). In 95% of adults, the basion-dens interval was less than 12 mm, and in 98%, the basion was situated no more than 12 mm anterior or 4 mm posterior to the posterior axial line (Fig 2).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a. Normal relationships within the craniocervical junction. Drawings illustrate the basion-dens interval (a), the posterior axial line, which is drawn along the posterior cortex of the axis (b), and the basion-posterior axial line interval (c). Horizontal line in c represents the range of acceptable basion positions.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b. Normal relationships within the craniocervical junction. Drawings illustrate the basion-dens interval (a), the posterior axial line, which is drawn along the posterior cortex of the axis (b), and the basion-posterior axial line interval (c). Horizontal line in c represents the range of acceptable basion positions.

 


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c. Normal relationships within the craniocervical junction. Drawings illustrate the basion-dens interval (a), the posterior axial line, which is drawn along the posterior cortex of the axis (b), and the basion-posterior axial line interval (c). Horizontal line in c represents the range of acceptable basion positions.

 
An abnormal distance between the dens or posterior axial line and the basion suggests failure or insufficiency of the alar ligaments, tectorial membrane, or both. Enlargement of the predental space, which should be less than 5 mm in children under 9 years of age and less than 3 mm in adults, points to injury of the transverse atlantal ligament. On the anteroposterior ("open-mouth" or odontoid) view of the craniocervical junction, the lateral masses of C1 should align exactly with the lateral margins of C2 when degenerative spurring is ignored. Stress views obtained with fluoroscopic guidance and performed in conjunction with the referring clinical service may reveal otherwise unidentified atlanto-occipital junction instability.

CT with sagittal and coronal reformatted images permits optimal detection and evaluation of fracture and luxation. The atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial articulations should be congruent on both coronal and sagittal reformatted images. Fractures of the tip of the dens or of the occipital condyles may be associated with alar ligament insufficiency. Subarachnoid hemorrhage and epidural hematoma may accompany injuries to the craniocervical junction and should be sought on CT scans of both the cervical spine and cranium.

Following mandatory lateral cervical spine radiography, screening CT of the cervical spine is the dominant imaging strategy in "adults" (ie, patients over 12 years old) if the patient's pretest probability of injury is 5% or greater. Injury mechanisms or clinical findings that, when present, place the patient in a high-risk category (>5% risk of cervical spine fracture) include a high-speed (>35-mph) motor vehicle accident, a crash resulting in death at the scene of the accident, a fall from a height greater than 10 feet, significant closed head injury (or intracranial hemorrhage seen at CT), neurologic signs or symptoms referred to the cervical spine, and pelvic or multiple extremity fractures (9). Otherwise, conventional radiographic screening is the most appropriate strategy. Data to help formulate screening criteria in children are lacking. We believe that routine screening CT of the cervical spine in children aged 9 years or younger is not indicated except in cases of known cervical spine fracture seen at other modalities. Three-dimensional CT does not appear to have a routine role in the work-up of cervical spine trauma. However, in complex fracture dislocations, particularly those with rotary components (eg, C1-C2 fracture rotary dislocations, atypical C1-C2 rotary fixations), three-dimensional imaging may be very useful in communicating findings to other clinicians and to the patient's family.

MR imaging of the cervical spine with fat-suppressed gradient-echo T2-weighted or STIR sequences can demonstrate increased signal intensity in the atlantoaxial and atlanto-occipital joints, craniocervical ligaments, prevertebral soft tissues, and spinal cord (10). Axial gradient-echo MR images may be particularly useful in assessing the integrity of the transverse atlantal ligament (11).


    Patterns of Injury
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
Dislocations at the craniocervical junction are grossly unstable injuries, often with significant neurologic or vascular compromise, and are frequently caused by high-speed motor vehicle collisions. Rotational and shearing forces at the craniocervical junction that result in clinical instability do so by injuring the alar ligaments, transverse ligament, or tectorial membrane. Ligamentous continuity can be disrupted by fractures near the attachments, avulsion, or tear within the substance of the ligament. Distraction injuries that result in craniocervical separation may be unilateral or bilateral and usually occur between the occiput and C1, between C1 and C2, or both (Fig 3). Dislocations are characterized by complete loss of articular continuity with varying degrees of distraction. Subluxations are generally less severe injuries in which some articular continuity is retained.



View larger version (171K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a. Type 3 dens fracture with associated left occipital condyle fracture. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph demonstrates a widely diastatic fracture through the body of C2. (b) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows a dens fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan demonstrates a left occipital condyle fracture.

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b. Type 3 dens fracture with associated left occipital condyle fracture. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph demonstrates a widely diastatic fracture through the body of C2. (b) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows a dens fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan demonstrates a left occipital condyle fracture.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c. Type 3 dens fracture with associated left occipital condyle fracture. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph demonstrates a widely diastatic fracture through the body of C2. (b) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows a dens fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan demonstrates a left occipital condyle fracture.

 
Atlanto-occipital Distraction
Ligamentous atlanto-occipital dislocation, displaced occipital condyle fractures with alar ligament avulsion, and tectorial membrane disruption account for most distraction injuries between the occiput and C1. Werne (12) demonstrated that disruption of both the tectorial membrane and the alar ligaments is required to produce isolated atlanto-occipital dislocation (Figs 47). Variants include unilateral injury, which may be subtle, and subluxations with minimal craniocervical separation (Fig 8).



View larger version (138K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. Cross-table lateral radiograph shows atlanto-occipital dislocation with a basion-dens interval of 25 mm. The patient died shortly after presentation.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. Cross-table lateral radiographs obtained in three different patients show varying amounts of pathologic widening (>12 mm) between the basion and dens with space clearly seen between the cranium and the C1 vertebral body. All three patients died shortly after presentation.

 


View larger version (145K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. Cross-table lateral radiographs obtained in three different patients show varying amounts of pathologic widening (>12 mm) between the basion and dens with space clearly seen between the cranium and the C1 vertebral body. All three patients died shortly after presentation.

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5c. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. Cross-table lateral radiographs obtained in three different patients show varying amounts of pathologic widening (>12 mm) between the basion and dens with space clearly seen between the cranium and the C1 vertebral body. All three patients died shortly after presentation.

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. Cross-table lateral radiograph demonstrates significant widening between the cranium and upper cervical spine as well as of the basion-dens interval. The patient died 2 days later.

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7a. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b, c) Left (b) and right (c) sagittal reformatted CT scans show bilateral widening of the atlanto-occipital joints with anterior displacement of the occipital condyles relative to the opposing atlantal articular masses. The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7b. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b, c) Left (b) and right (c) sagittal reformatted CT scans show bilateral widening of the atlanto-occipital joints with anterior displacement of the occipital condyles relative to the opposing atlantal articular masses. The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7c. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b, c) Left (b) and right (c) sagittal reformatted CT scans show bilateral widening of the atlanto-occipital joints with anterior displacement of the occipital condyles relative to the opposing atlantal articular masses. The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (163K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a. Atlanto-occipital subluxation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a mildly widened (13-mm) basion-dens interval. (b) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital (top arrowhead) and atlantoaxial (bottom arrowhead) joints. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan demonstrates unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital joint. (d) Parasagittal STIR MR image of the right side shows abnormal fluid in the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints (*).

 


View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b. Atlanto-occipital subluxation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a mildly widened (13-mm) basion-dens interval. (b) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital (top arrowhead) and atlantoaxial (bottom arrowhead) joints. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan demonstrates unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital joint. (d) Parasagittal STIR MR image of the right side shows abnormal fluid in the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints (*).

 


View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8c. Atlanto-occipital subluxation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a mildly widened (13-mm) basion-dens interval. (b) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital (top arrowhead) and atlantoaxial (bottom arrowhead) joints. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan demonstrates unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital joint. (d) Parasagittal STIR MR image of the right side shows abnormal fluid in the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints (*).

 


View larger version (170K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8d. Atlanto-occipital subluxation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a mildly widened (13-mm) basion-dens interval. (b) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital (top arrowhead) and atlantoaxial (bottom arrowhead) joints. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan demonstrates unilateral widening of the right atlanto-occipital joint. (d) Parasagittal STIR MR image of the right side shows abnormal fluid in the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints (*).

 
Occipital condyle fractures may be classified as impaction fractures, extensions of occipital skull fractures, or avulsion fractures at the insertions of the alar ligaments (13). The latter are potentially unstable fractures, particularly if displaced (14), and when associated with tectorial membrane injury can result in gross atlanto-occipital discontinuity (Figs 9, 10). Occipital condyle fractures may be unilateral or bilateral, may extend in a ringlike pattern around the foramen magnum, and are extremely difficult to identify on conventional radiographs (Fig 11) (15,16). Palsies of lower cranial nerves may also be seen in association with occipital condyle fractures (17). The 12th cranial nerve is most commonly involved, most often due to fracture extension through the hypoglossal canal (Fig 12).



View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9a. Occipital condyle fracture with atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b) Axial CT scan shows a right-sided occipital condyle fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint (arrowhead) and a right-sided occipital condyle fracture (arrow). (d) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows anterior dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint.

 


View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9b. Occipital condyle fracture with atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b) Axial CT scan shows a right-sided occipital condyle fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint (arrowhead) and a right-sided occipital condyle fracture (arrow). (d) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows anterior dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint.

 


View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9c. Occipital condyle fracture with atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b) Axial CT scan shows a right-sided occipital condyle fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint (arrowhead) and a right-sided occipital condyle fracture (arrow). (d) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows anterior dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9d. Occipital condyle fracture with atlanto-occipital dislocation. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows a widened basion-dens interval of 18 mm. (b) Axial CT scan shows a right-sided occipital condyle fracture. (c) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint (arrowhead) and a right-sided occipital condyle fracture (arrow). (d) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows anterior dislocation of the left atlanto-occipital joint.

 


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10. Occipital condyle fracture with atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial subluxation. Coronal reformatted CT scan demonstrates an occipital condyle fracture (arrow) with contralateral subluxation of the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints.

 


View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11a. Occipital condyle fracture. (a) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows an avulsion-type fracture of the basion (arrow). (b) CT scan shows a fracture line extending through the left occipital condyle. (c) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 3,272/68) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with edema or hemorrhage, as well as a spinal cord contusion (arrow).

 


View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11b. Occipital condyle fracture. (a) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows an avulsion-type fracture of the basion (arrow). (b) CT scan shows a fracture line extending through the left occipital condyle. (c) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 3,272/68) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with edema or hemorrhage, as well as a spinal cord contusion (arrow).

 


View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11c. Occipital condyle fracture. (a) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows an avulsion-type fracture of the basion (arrow). (b) CT scan shows a fracture line extending through the left occipital condyle. (c) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (repetition time msec/echo time msec = 3,272/68) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with edema or hemorrhage, as well as a spinal cord contusion (arrow).

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 12. Occipital condyle fracture in a patient with a 12th cranial nerve palsy. Axial CT scan demonstrates a displaced fracture through the region of the hypoglossal canal (arrow).

 
Lateral radiographic findings in atlanto-occipital distraction injuries include soft-tissue swelling and pathologic convexity of the soft tissues anterior to C2 (generally greater than 10 mm in thickness), a basion-dens interval greater than 12 mm, or a basion–posterior axial line interval more than 12 mm anterior or 4 mm posterior to the posterior axial line. Axial CT can help detect condylar fractures, which are often occult on conventional radiographs. Coronal and parasagittal reformatted images can show widening or incongruity of the articulation between the occipital condyles and the lateral masses of C1 as well as fractures of the basion (Fig 13). Sagittal or coronal MR imaging with T2-weighted or STIR sequences can easily demonstrate prevertebral soft-tissue swelling as well as fluid within the articular capsules, nuchal ligament, and interspinous ligaments. Complications including epidural hematoma, spinal cord injury, and brainstem compression can also be detected (Fig 14).



View larger version (136K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13. Basion fracture. CT scan shows a displaced fracture of the tip of the basion (arrow). This type of fracture may lead to a false low measurement of the basion-dens interval.

 


View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14a. Subtle atlanto-occipital injury. (a) On a cross-table lateral radiograph, the basion-dens interval (10 mm) and basion-posterior axial line interval are both normal. (b, c) Coronal (b) and parasagittal (c) fat-saturated MR images (5,000/36) show excessive joint fluid at the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. (d) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (5,000/36) shows precervical swelling (white *) and an expanding hematoma impinging on the spinal cord (black *).

 


View larger version (141K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14b. Subtle atlanto-occipital injury. (a) On a cross-table lateral radiograph, the basion-dens interval (10 mm) and basion-posterior axial line interval are both normal. (b, c) Coronal (b) and parasagittal (c) fat-saturated MR images (5,000/36) show excessive joint fluid at the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. (d) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (5,000/36) shows precervical swelling (white *) and an expanding hematoma impinging on the spinal cord (black *).

 


View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14c. Subtle atlanto-occipital injury. (a) On a cross-table lateral radiograph, the basion-dens interval (10 mm) and basion-posterior axial line interval are both normal. (b, c) Coronal (b) and parasagittal (c) fat-saturated MR images (5,000/36) show excessive joint fluid at the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. (d) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (5,000/36) shows precervical swelling (white *) and an expanding hematoma impinging on the spinal cord (black *).

 


View larger version (142K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14d. Subtle atlanto-occipital injury. (a) On a cross-table lateral radiograph, the basion-dens interval (10 mm) and basion-posterior axial line interval are both normal. (b, c) Coronal (b) and parasagittal (c) fat-saturated MR images (5,000/36) show excessive joint fluid at the atlanto-occipital and atlantoaxial joints. (d) Sagittal fat-saturated MR image (5,000/36) shows precervical swelling (white *) and an expanding hematoma impinging on the spinal cord (black *).

 
Atlantoaxial Distraction
Atlantoaxial distraction can result from the same severe extension and distraction forces as atlanto-occipital dislocation. Disruption of the articular capsules, alar ligaments, transverse ligament, and tectorial membrane between C1 and C2 (Fig 15) as well as occasional type 1 dens fractures characterize these injuries (18). Type 1 dens fractures that occur at the insertion of the alar ligaments may not directly affect the atlanto-occipital articulations but will result in instability from disruption of the C1-C2 joint capsules and supporting longitudinal ligaments (Fig 16). In such cases, the transverse atlantal ligament generally remains intact.



View larger version (160K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15. Atlantoaxial distraction. Cross-table lateral radiograph shows wide distraction between C1 and C2. The relationship between the C1 vertebral body and the cranium is normal, but distraction is seen at the atlantoaxial joints. The patient died in the emergency department.

 


View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16a. Type 1 dens fracture. Coronal (a) and axial (b) CT scans demonstrate a type 1 dens fracture (arrow).

 


View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16b. Type 1 dens fracture. Coronal (a) and axial (b) CT scans demonstrate a type 1 dens fracture (arrow).

 
Conventional radiographic and CT findings in atlantoaxial distraction include prevertebral soft-tissue swelling, C1-C2 dislocation or subluxation, and widening of the C1-C2 facets. MR imaging findings consist of prevertebral, interspinous, or nuchal ligament edema as well as facet widening or fluid, possible epidural hematoma, and increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on T2-weighted or STIR images.

Neurovascular Injury
In fatal cases of atlanto-occipital dislocation, the most common spinocerebral injuries include lacerations of the pontomedullary junction (75%), contusion or laceration of the caudal medulla and rostral spinal cord (42%), and stretching or laceration of the midbrain (33%). Subarachnoid hemorrhage is common but may be minimal (Fig 17). Subdural hemorrhage is seen in 16% of cases (18). Vasospasm and dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries have been documented at angiography in several survivors of atlanto-occipital dislocation who did not have significant injuries to the spinal cord or brainstem (19). MR or CT angiography can noninvasively demonstrate vascular patency, although these modalities are presumably less sensitive for the diagnosis of small subintimal flaps (20).



View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 17a. Hemorrhage associated with atlanto-occipital injuries. (a) Unenhanced head CT scan shows areas of hyperattenuation surrounding the spinal cord and layering dependently (arrow), findings that are consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage. (b) Unenhanced head CT scan demonstrates areas of hyperattenuation in the perimesencephalic and supra-sellar cisterns, findings that are also consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

 


View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 17b. Hemorrhage associated with atlanto-occipital injuries. (a) Unenhanced head CT scan shows areas of hyperattenuation surrounding the spinal cord and layering dependently (arrow), findings that are consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage. (b) Unenhanced head CT scan demonstrates areas of hyperattenuation in the perimesencephalic and supra-sellar cisterns, findings that are also consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

 
Pediatric Atlanto-occipital Dislocation
Traumatic atlanto-occipital dislocation in children presents a diagnostic challenge owing in part to the variability of bone ossification in the craniocervical junction. Because of this variability in ossification and fusion, particularly of the dens, Harris et al (7) found the basion-dens interval diagnostically unreliable in children under the age of 13 years. However, the basion-posterior axial line interval was found to be reproducible and normally did not exceed 12 mm. Children may be at particular risk for atlanto-occipital injury due to increased ligamentous laxity, large size of the head relative to the body, and hypoplastic occipital condyles (Figs 1820) (21,22).



View larger version (173K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 6-year-old boy. Cross-table lateral radiograph demonstrates marked widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. The patient died in the emergency department.

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19a. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 10-year-old girl. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. (b) Axial CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow) and occipital condyles. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow). (d) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the occipital condyles (arrows). (e) Parasagittal MR image (3,816/30; inversion time msec = 180) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with fluid, as well as hemorrhage or edema below the posterior longitudinal ligament (arrowhead). The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19b. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 10-year-old girl. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. (b) Axial CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow) and occipital condyles. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow). (d) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the occipital condyles (arrows). (e) Parasagittal MR image (3,816/30; inversion time msec = 180) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with fluid, as well as hemorrhage or edema below the posterior longitudinal ligament (arrowhead). The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19c. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 10-year-old girl. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. (b) Axial CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow) and occipital condyles. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow). (d) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the occipital condyles (arrows). (e) Parasagittal MR image (3,816/30; inversion time msec = 180) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with fluid, as well as hemorrhage or edema below the posterior longitudinal ligament (arrowhead). The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (156K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19d. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 10-year-old girl. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. (b) Axial CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow) and occipital condyles. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow). (d) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the occipital condyles (arrows). (e) Parasagittal MR image (3,816/30; inversion time msec = 180) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with fluid, as well as hemorrhage or edema below the posterior longitudinal ligament (arrowhead). The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19e. Atlanto-occipital dislocation in a 10-year-old girl. (a) Cross-table lateral radiograph shows widening of the basion-dens and basion-posterior axial line intervals. (b) Axial CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow) and occipital condyles. (c) Sagittal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the basion (arrow). (d) Coronal reformatted CT scan shows displaced fractures of the occipital condyles (arrows). (e) Parasagittal MR image (3,816/30; inversion time msec = 180) shows abnormal high signal intensity in the precervical space (*), a finding that is consistent with fluid, as well as hemorrhage or edema below the posterior longitudinal ligament (arrowhead). The patient survived but had substantial neurologic deficit.

 


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 20. Normal occipital condyle synchondrosis in a 7-year-old boy. Axial CT scan obtained at the level of the occipital condyles shows linear areas of low attenuation through the left occipital condyle representing normal synchondrosis (arrowhead). This finding should not be confused with fracture in pediatric patients.

 

    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 
Injuries to the atlanto-occipital region may be radiographically dramatic or, occasionally, subtle; in either case, however, they are usually of critical clinical importance. Several areas merit intense scrutiny by the trauma radiologist, particularly when an atlanto-occipital injury is suspected. On cross-table lateral radiographs, the basion-dens and basion–posterior axial line intervals should be measured. Fractures, when present, raise the possibility of associated ligamentous injury and instability. At CT, joint congruity must be assessed. Even small, flakelike fractures may portend significant ligamentous avulsions and potential instability.

Other CT findings that may suggest atlanto-occipital injury include focal hematomas, vertebral artery injury, capsular swelling, and, rarely, fractures through cranial nerve canals (usually suspected clinically due to a cranial nerve palsy). At MR imaging, precervical fluid and widened, often fluid-filled joint spaces are important clues to injury, as is direct visualization of ligamentous or spinal cord injuries. Atlanto-occipital injuries, including atlanto-occipital dislocations, were long believed to be almost uniformly fatal; now, however, they are recognized as potentially survivable, although commonly with substantial morbidity (2325). Increasing survival is probably attributable to prompt in-field spine immobilization and intubation and rapid transfer to a trauma center (26). Swift diagnosis of these injuries by the trauma radiologist is crucial for ensuring prompt, effective treatment for affected patients.


    Footnotes
 
Abbreviation: STIR = short-inversion-time inversion recovery


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 LEARNING OBJECTIVES FOR TEST...
 Introduction
 Normal Anatomy and Imaging...
 Patterns of Injury
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Tepper SL, Fligner CL, Reay DT. Atlanto-occipital disarticulation: accident characteristics. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1990; 11:193-197.[Medline]
  2. Bucholz RW, Burkhead WZ, Graham W, Petty C. Occult cervical spine injuries in fatal traffic accidents. J Trauma 1979; 19:768-771.[Medline]
  3. Alker GJ, Jr, Oh YS, Leslie EV. High cervical spine and craniocervical junction injuries in fatal traffic accidents: a radiological study. Orthop Clin North Am 1978; 9:1003-1010.[Medline]
  4. Adams VI. Neck injuries. I. Occipitoatlantal dislocation: a pathologic study of twelve traffic fatalities. J Forensic Sci 1992; 37:556-564.
  5. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC. The etiology of missed cervical spine injuries. J Trauma 1993; 34:342-345.