RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erasmus, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erasmus, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest Radiology
Right arrowRelated Article
(Radiographics. 2000;20:59-66.)
© RSNA, 2000


SCIENTIFIC EXHIBIT

Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Part II. Evaluation of the Indeterminate Nodule1

Jeremy J. Erasmus, MD , H. Page McAdams, MD and John E. Connolly, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710 (J.J.E., H.P.M.), and the Department of Radiology, Rush Presbyterian Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (J.E.C.). Presented as a scientific exhibit at the 1998 RSNA scientific assembly. Received February 19, 1999; revision requested March 29 and received June 9; accepted June 10. Address reprint requests to J.J.E.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
Various strategies may be used to evaluate indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules. Growth rate assessment is an important and cost-effective step in the evaluation of these nodules. Clinical features (eg, patient age, history of prior malignancy, presenting symptoms, smoking history) can be useful in suggesting the diagnosis and aiding in management planning. Bayesian analysis allows more precise determination of the probability of malignancy (pCa). Decision analysis models suggest that the most cost-effective management strategy depends on the pCa for a given nodule. At contrast material–enhanced computed tomography, nodular enhancement of less than 15 HU is strongly predictive of a benign lesion, whereas enhancement of more than 20 HU typically indicates malignancy. At 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography, lesions with low FDG uptake are typically benign, whereas those with increased FDG uptake are typically malignant. Results of transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy influence management in approximately 50% of cases and, in indeterminate lesions with a pCa between 0.05 and 0.6, is the best initial diagnostic procedure. It is optimally used in peripheral nodules and has been reported to establish a benign diagnosis in up to 91% of cases. Although there is no one correct management approach, the ability to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary lesions has improved with the use of these strategies.

Index Terms: Fluorine, radioactive, 60.12163 • Lung, CT, 60.1211 • Lung, diseases, 60.281, 60.332 • Lung, nodule, 60.11, 60.1211, 60.12163, 60.281, 60.332 • Lung, radionuclide studies, 60.12163


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
Although a number of clinical and radiologic features may suggest the diagnosis, many solitary pulmonary nodules remain indeterminate after conventional radiologic evaluation. If there are no definite benign morphologic findings, the solitary pulmonary nodule is classified as an indeterminate, possibly malignant lesion. Many solitary pulmonary nodules have similar features, and 25%–39% of malignant nodules are inaccurately classified as benign after radiologic assessment of size, margins, contour, and internal characteristics (1,2). As a result, a noninvasive diagnosis is often not possible. Indeterminate nodules may be treated with biopsy, resection, or simple observation depending on the radiologic appearance of the nodule, the patient's clinical history and current status, and the likelihood of malignancy. However, there are additional objective parameters that may aid in further stratifying indeterminate nodules.

In this article, we review the use of growth rate assessment and clinical data in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. In addition, we discuss developments in management strategies including Bayesian analysis, decision analysis, contrast material–enhanced computed tomography (CT), 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), and transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy with emphasis on cost-effectiveness.


    Growth Rate Assessment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
An important and cost-effective step in the evaluation of a solitary pulmonary nodule is determining its growth rate by comparing its size on a current image with that on prior images. Doubling time (ie, the time required for a nodule to double in volume) for most malignant nodules is between 30 and 400 days and results in a 26% increase in nodule diameter (3). Nodules that double either more rapidly or more slowly typically have a benign cause. Stability at chest radiography or CT over a 2-year period implies a doubling time of at least 730 days and is generally considered to be a reliable indicator of a benign cause (47). However, the assumption that stability over a 2-year period indicates benignity has recently come into question. Recalculation from the original data shows that the predictive value for benign disease is only 65% if the nodule is stable in size for a period of 2 years (5,8,9). Furthermore, it can be difficult to reliably detect growth in small (<1-cm) nodules. For example, a 5-mm nodule can double in volume over a 6-month period (malignant growth rate), but its diameter will increase by only 1.25 mm to 6.25 mm. This 1.25-mm change in diameter cannot be reliably detected with either radiography or CT. Thus, small lung malignancies can double in volume and yet appear radiologically stable, resulting in a delay in diagnosis (Fig 1). To overcome this limitation, it has been proposed that the growth rate of small nodules be assessed with serial measurements of volume rather than diameter (10). Although measurement of volume (which increases proportionally faster than diameter) may be more accurate in growth rate assessment for small nodules, experience suggests that most nodules greater than 1 cm in diameter that are stable in size for at least 2 years are benign.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1.   Effect of initial nodule size on perception of growth. Schematic illustrates two volume doublings of a 4-mm nodule and a 3-cm nodule. Because the eye perceives the arithmetic increase in diameter rather than the change in volume, the smaller nodule appears to be growing more slowly than the larger one, even though both are doubling in volume at the same rate.

 

    Clinical Data
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
Clinical features such as patient age, history of prior malignancy, presenting symptoms, and smoking history can be useful in suggesting the diagnosis and aiding in management planning (Figs 24). For example, a new lung nodule that is detected in a young adult patient with a peripheral sarcoma is more likely to be a solitary metastasis than a primary lung tumor. Similarly, in a patient in whom infection or infarction is strongly suspected clinically, follow-up radiography performed 1–2 weeks later may suffice for further evaluation.



View larger version (130K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a.   Pulmonary infarct in 65-year-old woman who presented with pleuritic chest pain. (a) Close-up posteroanterior radiograph of the right lung shows a poorly marginated nodule peripherally in the lower lobe. Because of symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism, technetium-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigraphy was performed. (b) Tc-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigram shows multiple segmental perfusion defects, findings consistent with pulmonary embolism. Results of a ventilation scan (not shown) were normal.

 


View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b.   Pulmonary infarct in 65-year-old woman who presented with pleuritic chest pain. (a) Close-up posteroanterior radiograph of the right lung shows a poorly marginated nodule peripherally in the lower lobe. Because of symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism, technetium-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigraphy was performed. (b) Tc-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigram shows multiple segmental perfusion defects, findings consistent with pulmonary embolism. Results of a ventilation scan (not shown) were normal.

 


View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c.   Pulmonary infarct in 65-year-old woman who presented with pleuritic chest pain. (a) Close-up posteroanterior radiograph of the right lung shows a poorly marginated nodule peripherally in the lower lobe. Because of symptoms suggestive of pulmonary embolism, technetium-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigraphy was performed. (b) Tc-99m microaggregated albumin perfusion scintigram shows multiple segmental perfusion defects, findings consistent with pulmonary embolism. Results of a ventilation scan (not shown) were normal.

 


View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3.   Round pneumonia in a 23-year-old woman who presented with cough and fever. Close-up posteroanterior radiograph of the left lung shows a poorly marginated nodule in the midlung. Because of clinical symptoms, the patient was treated for community-acquired pneumonia. Follow-up radiography performed 2 weeks later demonstrated complete resolution of the nodular area of increased opacity.

 


View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a.   Pulmonary hematoma in a 65-year-old woman. (a) Posteroanterior radiograph obtained 1 week after the patient underwent aortic valve replacement shows a well-marginated nodule in the middle of the left lung. (b) Initial postoperative anteroposterior radiograph shows bilateral pleural tubes and an area of increased opacity adjacent to the tip of the left pleural tube, a finding that is consistent with intrapulmonary hematoma. Follow-up radiography demonstrated resolution of the nodule.

 


View larger version (162K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b.   Pulmonary hematoma in a 65-year-old woman. (a) Posteroanterior radiograph obtained 1 week after the patient underwent aortic valve replacement shows a well-marginated nodule in the middle of the left lung. (b) Initial postoperative anteroposterior radiograph shows bilateral pleural tubes and an area of increased opacity adjacent to the tip of the left pleural tube, a finding that is consistent with intrapulmonary hematoma. Follow-up radiography demonstrated resolution of the nodule.

 

    Management Strategies
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
Bayesian Analysis
Bayesian analysis can be useful in the evaluation of indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodules by allowing more precise determination of the probability of malignancy (pCa) (11,12). Bayesian analysis uses likelihood ratios (LRs) for numerous radiologic findings and clinical features associated with solitary pulmonary nodules to estimate pCa (11). The LR for a given characteristic is derived as follows:

An LR of 1.0 indicates a 50% chance of malignancy. LRs less than 1.0 typically indicate benign lesions, whereas LRs greater than 1.0 typically indicate malignancy. LRs for selected radiologic features of nodules and patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The odds of malignancy are calculated as

where LRprior is the likelihood of malignancy in all nodules based on local prevalence of malignancy and LRsize, LRsh (LRsmoking history), and so on are possible additional variables. pCa is calculated as

.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. LRs for Selected Radiologic Features of Nodules and Patient Characteristics
 
Bayesian analysis has been shown to be superior to evaluation by experienced radiologists in the stratification of benign and malignant nodules and can be useful in determining treatment options. pCa for any nodule can be calculated with Bayesian analysis on Dr J. Gurney's Internet Web site at www.chestx-ray.com.

Table 2 demonstrates evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Four clinical scenarios involving hypothetical male patients with a smoothly marginated 7-mm nodule in the right middle lobe (Fig 5) are evaluated with published LRs (11) and an estimated prior pCa of 40%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Odds and Probability of Cancer in Four Hypothetical Situations
 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5.   Effect of age and smoking history on pCa in an indeterminate pulmonary nodule. Close-up chest CT scan of the right lung shows a 7-mm, smoothly marginated, noncalcified nodule in the middle lobe. On the basis of decision analysis, observation would be the most cost-effective management strategy in a 35-year-old nonsmoker (pCa = 0.01) or current smoker (pCa = 0.05), and biopsy would be the most cost-effective management strategy in a 70-year-old nonsmoker (pCa = 0.07) or current smoker (pCa = 0.50) (cf Table 2).

 
Decision Analysis
Decision analysis models suggest that the most cost-effective strategy for management of a solitary pulmonary nodule depends on the pCa for that nodule. Several studies from the mid-1980s suggest that the most cost-effective strategy is observation when pCa is low (<0.05), immediate surgical resection when pCa is high (>=0.60), and biopsy when pCa is between 0.05 and 0.60 (Fig 5) (3,1315). These data suggest that the most cost-effective management strategy for the first two patients in Table 2 is observation, whereas the most cost-effective strategy for the third and fourth patients is biopsy.

Unfortunately, these studies did not include discussion of some of the more advanced imaging modalities (eg, contrast-enhanced CT, PET) that are useful in the preoperative stratification of benign and malignant nodules.

Contrast-enhanced CT
Contrast-enhanced CT allows accurate differentiation of benign and malignant nodules. It has been suggested that blood flow in malignant pulmonary nodules is qualitatively and quantitatively different from that in benign nodules (16,17). The degree of enhancement is directly related to the likelihood of malignancy and the vascularity of the nodule (17,18). Enhancement can be assessed by obtaining contiguous thin sections (1–3 mm) through the nodule before and after contrast material administration. Contrast material (iodine) is administered intravenously with power injection (300 mg/mL at 2 mL/sec; total dose, 420 mg/kg), and contiguous sections are obtained through the nodule every 30 seconds for 5 minutes. Attenuation of the nodule is measured in a centrally placed region of interest prior to and at the peak of contrast enhancement. Nodular enhancement of less than 15 HU after contrast material administration is strongly predictive of a benign lesion, whereas enhancement of more than 20 HU typically indicates malignancy (sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 73%; accuracy, 85%) (Fig 6) (16).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6.   Metastatic melanoma in a 40-year-old man. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows enhancement of 35 HU in a right lung nodule, a finding that is suggestive of malignancy. Metastatic melanoma was confirmed at resection.

 
FDG Positron Emission Tomography
PET is a physiologic imaging technique that uses metabolic substrates such as amino acids or glucose that are labeled with positron-emitting radioisotopes. Although several radionuclides are currently available, FDG, a d-glucose analog, is the most commonly used. Increased glucose metabolism in tumors results in increased uptake, trapping, and accumulation of FDG, permitting differentiation of benign and malignant nodules (Figs 7, 8). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET in the diagnosis of benign nodules are 96%, 88%, and 94%, respectively (2025). The use of FDG PET alone has been reported to be a better predictor of malignancy than standard clinical and morphologic criteria used in Bayesian analysis (24,26).



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7a.   Non-small cell lung cancer in a 65-year-old man. (a) Chest CT scan shows a small nodule in the left lower lobe. (b) Axial FDG PET scan shows marked FDG accumulation in the nodule, a finding that is suspicious for malignancy. Lung cancer was confirmed at resection.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7b.   Non-small cell lung cancer in a 65-year-old man. (a) Chest CT scan shows a small nodule in the left lower lobe. (b) Axial FDG PET scan shows marked FDG accumulation in the nodule, a finding that is suspicious for malignancy. Lung cancer was confirmed at resection.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a.   Pulmonary cyst in a 42-year-old man with emphysema who was undergoing pre-lung transplantation evaluation. (a) Posteroanterior radiograph shows emphysema and a well-marginated nodule in the left lower lobe. (b) Chest CT scan helps confirm the homogeneous left lower lobe nodule. (c) Axial FDG PET scan obtained at the same level as b shows no increased metabolic activity in the region of the nodule. These findings are consistent with benignity, and hemorrhagic cyst was diagnosed at lung transplantation 18 months later. C = normal cardiac uptake, V = vertebra. (Fig 8 reprinted, with permission, from reference 19.)

 


View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b.   Pulmonary cyst in a 42-year-old man with emphysema who was undergoing pre-lung transplantation evaluation. (a) Posteroanterior radiograph shows emphysema and a well-marginated nodule in the left lower lobe. (b) Chest CT scan helps confirm the homogeneous left lower lobe nodule. (c) Axial FDG PET scan obtained at the same level as b shows no increased metabolic activity in the region of the nodule. These findings are consistent with benignity, and hemorrhagic cyst was diagnosed at lung transplantation 18 months later. C = normal cardiac uptake, V = vertebra. (Fig 8 reprinted, with permission, from reference 19.)

 


View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8c.   Pulmonary cyst in a 42-year-old man with emphysema who was undergoing pre-lung transplantation evaluation. (a) Posteroanterior radiograph shows emphysema and a well-marginated nodule in the left lower lobe. (b) Chest CT scan helps confirm the homogeneous left lower lobe nodule. (c) Axial FDG PET scan obtained at the same level as b shows no increased metabolic activity in the region of the nodule. These findings are consistent with benignity, and hemorrhagic cyst was diagnosed at lung transplantation 18 months later. C = normal cardiac uptake, V = vertebra. (Fig 8 reprinted, with permission, from reference 19.)

 
The high specificity of FDG PET for the diagnosis of benign lesions has important clinical utility. Lesions with low FDG uptake may be considered benign. However, these lesions should be followed up radiologically because false-negative results, although rare, may be seen in primary pulmonary malignancies (eg, carcinoid tumors and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma may demonstrate lower FDG uptake than is expected for malignant tumors and PET can yield false-negative results in lesions less than 10 mm in diameter) (2729).

Solitary pulmonary nodules with increased FDG uptake should be considered malignant, although false-positive results can be obtained in patients with infectious and inflammatory processes such as active tuberculosis, histoplasmosis, and rheumatoid nodules (4,20,3032).

Transthoracic Needle Aspiration Biopsy
When the radiologic features of a pulmonary nodule are not diagnostic, transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy, bronchoscopy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or thoracotomy may be performed. Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy has been shown to influence management in approximately 50% of patients and, if the likelihood of malignancy is between 5% and 60% (ie, pCa is between 0.05 and 0.6), is the best initial diagnostic procedure (33,34). Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy is optimally used in peripheral nodules, although this procedure can be performed in most radiographically visible lesions if it is clinically indicated (3537). Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of malignancy even in small nodules (95%–100% in nodules less than 10–15 mm in diameter) (3537). It can be difficult to diagnose a specific benign entity with this procedure, although it has been reported to establish a benign diagnosis in up to 91% of patients (38). Complications, most notably pneumothorax and hemorrhage, occur in approximately 5%–30% of patients (35,39,40). Hemorrhage is almost always self-limiting, and only about 15% of patients with pneumothoraces will eventually require chest tube placement (35,39).


    Conclusions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 
The solitary pulmonary nodule is a common radiologic finding that can require extensive evaluation to establish a benign or malignant diagnosis. There is no one correct management approach; rather, the objective is to use a logical, directed approach that takes into account both clinical history and radiologic findings to determine the cause cost-effectively. Morphologic evaluation of the size, margins, contour, and internal characteristics of a solitary pulmonary nodule with conventional imaging techniques is often unreliable in differentiating benign from malignant nodules. However, the ability to make this distinction has improved with the use of contrast-enhanced CT, PET, and Bayesian analysis.


    Footnotes
 
See also the article by Erasmus et al (pp 43–58 ) in this issue.

Abbreviations: FDG = 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose LR = likelihood ratio pCa = probability of malignancy PET = positron emission tomography


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Growth Rate Assessment
 Clinical Data
 Management Strategies
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology 1993; 186:415-422.
  2. Edwards WM, Cox RS, Jr, Garland LH. The solitary nodule (coin lesion) of the lung: an analysis of 52 consecutive cases treated by thoracotomy and a study of preoperative diagnostic accuracy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1962; 88:1020-1042.
  3. Lillington GA, Caskey CI. Evaluation and management of solitary multiple pulmonary nodules. Clin Chest Med 1993; 14:111-119.[Medline]
  4. Dewan NA, Gupta NC, Redepenning LS, Phalen JJ, Frick MP. Diagnostic efficacy of PET-FDG imaging in solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 1993; 104:997-1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Good CA, Wilson TW. The solitary circumscribed pulmonary nodule. JAMA 1958; 166:210-215.
  6. Good CA. Management of patient with solitary mass in lung. Chic Med Soc Bull 1953; 55:893-896.
  7. Lillington GA. Disease-a-Month 37th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby–Year Book, 1991; 271-318.
  8. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Does 2-year stability imply that pulmonary nodules are benign?. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:325-328.[Free Full Text]
  9. Hood RT, Jr, Good CA, Clagett OT, McDonald JR. Solitary circumscribed lesions of the lung: study of 156 cases in which resection was performed. JAMA 1953; 152:1185-1191.
  10. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, Zhao B, Henschke CI. Determination of malignancy in small pulmonary nodules based on volumetrically determined growth rates (abstr). Radiology 1998; 209(suppl):375.
  11. Gurney JW. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis. Radiology 1993; 186:405-413.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Black WC, Armstrong P. Communicating the significance of radiologic test results: the likelihood ratio. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986; 147:1313-1318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kunstaetter R, Wolkove N, Kreisman H, Cohen C, Frank H. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Med Decis Making 1985; 5:61-75.
  14. Lillington GA, Cummings SR. Decision analysis approaches in solitary pulmonary nodules. Semin Respir Med 1989; 10:227-231.
  15. Cummings SR, Lillington GA, Richard RJ. Managing solitary pulmonary nodules. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986; 134:453-460.[Medline]
  16. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL, Midthun DE. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: prospective findings. Radiology 1996; 201:447-455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yamashita K, Matsunobe S, Tsuda T, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodule: preliminary study of evaluation with incremental dynamic CT. Radiology 1995; 194:399-405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL. Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology 1995; 194:393-398.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Patz EF, Jr, Goodman PC, Coleman RE. Thoracic FDG PET: state of the art. RadioGraphics 1998; 18:5-20.[Abstract]
  20. Patz EF, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, et al. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology 1993; 188:487-490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gupta NC, Frank AR, Dewan NA, et al. Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection of malignancy with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Radiology 1992; 184:441-444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Scott WJ, Schwabe JL, Gupta NC, Dewan NA, Reeb SD, Sugimoto JT. Positron emission tomography of lung tumors and mediastinal lymph nodes using [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 58:698-703.[Abstract]
  23. Conti PS, Lilien DL, Hawley K, Keppler J, Grafton ST, Bading JR. PET and [18F]-FDG in oncology: a clinical update. Nucl Med Biol 1996; 23:717-735.[Medline]
  24. Gupta NC, Maloof J, Gunel E. Probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules using fluorine-18-FDG and PET. J Nucl Med 1996; 37:943-948.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hübner KF, Buonocore E, Gould HR, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using "quantitative" parameters of FDG PET images. Clin Nucl Med 1996; 21:941-949.[Medline]
  26. Dewan NA, Shehan CJ, Reeb SD, Gobar LS, Scott WJ, Ryschon K. Likelihood of malignancy in a solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 1997; 112:416-422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Patz EF, Jr, Coleman RE, Ahuja V, Goodman PC. Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumors using FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1369-1373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Seki H, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET imaging is negative in bronchioloalveolar lung carcinoma. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:1016-1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Lowe VJ, Fletcher JW, Gobar L, et al. Prospective investigation of PET in lung nodules (PIOPILN). J Clin Oncol 1998; 16:1075-1084.[Abstract]
  30. Strauss LG, Conti PS. The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 1991; 32:623-648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Kubota K, Matsuzawa T, Fujiwara T, et al. Differential diagnosis of lung tumor with positron emission tomography: a prospective study. J Nucl Med 1990; 31:1927-1933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Quint LE, Francis IR, Wahl RL, Gross BH, Glazer GM. Preoperative staging of non–small-cell carcinoma of the lung: imaging methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164:1349-1359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lee SI, Shepard JO, Boiselle PM, Trotman-Dickenson B, McLoud TC. Role of transthoracic needle biopsy in patient treatment decisions (abstr). Radiology 1996; 201(suppl):269.
  34. Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI, Altorki NK. Cost analysis of competing strategies for evaluating and treating solitary pulmonary nodules (abstr). Radiology 1996; 201(suppl):269.
  35. Klein JS, Zarka MA. Thoracic needle biopsy: an overview. J Thorac Imaging 1997; 12:232-249.[Medline]
  36. Westcott JL, Rao N, Colly DP. Transthoracic needle biopsy of small pulmonary nodules. Radiology 1997; 202:97-103.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Li H, Boiselle PM, Shepard JO, Trotman-Dickenson B, McLoud TC. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of CT-guided percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy of the lung: comparison of small and large pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:105-109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology 1996; 198:715-720.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Moore EH. Needle-aspiration lung biopsy: a comprehensive approach to complication reduction. J Thorac Imaging 1997; 12:259-271.[Medline]
  40. Miller JA, Pramanik BK, Lavenhar MA. Predicting the rates of success and complications of computed tomography–guided percutaneous core-needle biopsies of the thorax from the findings of the preprocedure chest computed tomography scan. J Thorac Imaging 1998; 13:7-13.[Medline]

Related Article

Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Part I. Morphologic Evaluation for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions
Jeremy J. Erasmus, John E. Connolly, H. Page McAdams, and Victor L. Roggli
RadioGraphics 2000 20: 43-58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
F. Wang, Z. Wang, W. Yao, H. Xie, J. Xu, and L. Tian
Role of 99mTc-Octreotide Acetate Scintigraphy in Suspected Lung Cancer Compared with 18F-FDG Dual-Head Coincidence Imaging
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1442 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. J. Jeong, C. A. Yi, and K. S. Lee
Solitary Pulmonary Nodules: Detection, Characterization, and Guidance for Further Diagnostic Workup and Treatment
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 57 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
T. Bunyaviroch and R. E. Coleman
PET Evaluation of Lung Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 451 - 469.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. E. Heffner, K. Highland, and L. K. Brown
A Meta-analysis Derivation of Continuous Likelihood Ratios for Diagnosing Pleural Fluid Exudates
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2003; 167(12): 1591 - 1599.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
X. Varas, J. H. Leborgne, F. Leborgne, J. Mezzera, S. Jaumandreu, and F. Leborgne
Revisiting the Mammographic Follow-Up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 691 - 695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. Nawa, T. Nakagawa, S. Kusano, Y. Kawasaki, Y. Sugawara, and H. Nakata
Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Spiral CT* : Results of Baseline and 1-Year Follow-up Studies
Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Schaefer-Prokop and M. Prokop
New imaging techniques in the treatment guidelines for lung cancer
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 71S - 83s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Imdahl, S. Jenkner, I. Brink, E. Nitzsche, E. Stoelben, E. Moser, and J. Hasse
Validation of FDG positron emission tomography for differentiation of unknown pulmonary lesions
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2001; 20(2): 324 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Boiselle, A. Ernst, and D. D. Karp
Lung Cancer Detection in the 21st Century: Potential Contributions and Challenges of Emerging Technologies
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1215 - 1221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erasmus, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erasmus, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Chest Radiology
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE