RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.27si075510
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harish, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harish, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Breast (Imaging and Interventional)
Right arrow Oncologic Imaging
Right arrow Computed Tomography

Breast Lesions Incidentally Detected with CT: What the General Radiologist Needs to Know1

Monica G. Harish, MD2, Sheela D. Konda, MD, PhD2, Heber MacMahon, MB, BCh, and Gillian M. Newstead, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 6, 2007; revision requested March 29 and received May 9; accepted May 16. H.M. is a stockholder in R2 Technology, consults for Riverain Medical and MEDIAN Technologies, and receives research support from R2 Technology, Mitsubishi Space Software, General Electric, and Eastman Kodak; G.M.N. is a member of the speakers bureau for Fuji Photo Film and the advisory board for Konica Minolta; all other authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

Figure 1A
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1a.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a–c) Axial (a) and coronal (b) nonenhanced CT scans and mediolateral mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated, dense, ill-defined mass (arrow in c). (d) US image shows the hypoechoic mass with irregular margins and hypervascularity.

 

Figure 1B
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1b.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a–c) Axial (a) and coronal (b) nonenhanced CT scans and mediolateral mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated, dense, ill-defined mass (arrow in c). (d) US image shows the hypoechoic mass with irregular margins and hypervascularity.

 

Figure 1C
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1c.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a–c) Axial (a) and coronal (b) nonenhanced CT scans and mediolateral mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated, dense, ill-defined mass (arrow in c). (d) US image shows the hypoechoic mass with irregular margins and hypervascularity.

 

Figure 1D
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1d.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a–c) Axial (a) and coronal (b) nonenhanced CT scans and mediolateral mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated, dense, ill-defined mass (arrow in c). (d) US image shows the hypoechoic mass with irregular margins and hypervascularity.

 

Figure 2A
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2a.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show a rim-enhancing irregular mass. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows that the dense mass (arrow) is ill defined anteriorly.

 

Figure 2B
View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2b.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show a rim-enhancing irregular mass. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows that the dense mass (arrow) is ill defined anteriorly.

 

Figure 2C
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2c.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show a rim-enhancing irregular mass. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows that the dense mass (arrow) is ill defined anteriorly.

 

Figure 3A
View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3a.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans and craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated mass (arrow) with associated nipple retraction and skin thickening.

 

Figure 3B
View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3b.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans and craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated mass (arrow) with associated nipple retraction and skin thickening.

 

Figure 3C
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3c.  Invasive ductal carcinoma. Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans and craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast (c) show a spiculated mass (arrow) with associated nipple retraction and skin thickening.

 

Figure 4A
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4a.  Invasive lobular carcinoma. (a–c) Serial axial contrast-enhanced CT scans, displayed from cranial (a) to caudal (c), show a diffusely infiltrating enhancing area of opacity without a discrete mass (arrow in b). The nodular density lateral to the breast with calcification is likely a benign finding. (d) Axial CT scan of the opposite breast, obtained at the same level as b, shows the subtle asymmetry.

 

Figure 4B
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4b.  Invasive lobular carcinoma. (a–c) Serial axial contrast-enhanced CT scans, displayed from cranial (a) to caudal (c), show a diffusely infiltrating enhancing area of opacity without a discrete mass (arrow in b). The nodular density lateral to the breast with calcification is likely a benign finding. (d) Axial CT scan of the opposite breast, obtained at the same level as b, shows the subtle asymmetry.

 

Figure 4C
View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4c.  Invasive lobular carcinoma. (a–c) Serial axial contrast-enhanced CT scans, displayed from cranial (a) to caudal (c), show a diffusely infiltrating enhancing area of opacity without a discrete mass (arrow in b). The nodular density lateral to the breast with calcification is likely a benign finding. (d) Axial CT scan of the opposite breast, obtained at the same level as b, shows the subtle asymmetry.

 

Figure 4D
View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4d.  Invasive lobular carcinoma. (a–c) Serial axial contrast-enhanced CT scans, displayed from cranial (a) to caudal (c), show a diffusely infiltrating enhancing area of opacity without a discrete mass (arrow in b). The nodular density lateral to the breast with calcification is likely a benign finding. (d) Axial CT scan of the opposite breast, obtained at the same level as b, shows the subtle asymmetry.

 

Figure 5A
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5a.  Secondary lymphoma of the breast. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral marked axillary adenopathy (arrows). (b, c) Bilateral mediolateral mammograms show large dense masses (arrow) in the right (b) and left (c) axillae. The masses are due to lymphadenopathy from secondary lymphoma. (d) Contrast-enhanced CT scan of another patient shows skin thickening with palpable large, irregular masses. The masses demonstrate poor enhancement because the image is from the arterial phase of a pulmonary embolus study.

 

Figure 5B
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5b.  Secondary lymphoma of the breast. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral marked axillary adenopathy (arrows). (b, c) Bilateral mediolateral mammograms show large dense masses (arrow) in the right (b) and left (c) axillae. The masses are due to lymphadenopathy from secondary lymphoma. (d) Contrast-enhanced CT scan of another patient shows skin thickening with palpable large, irregular masses. The masses demonstrate poor enhancement because the image is from the arterial phase of a pulmonary embolus study.

 

Figure 5C
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5c.  Secondary lymphoma of the breast. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral marked axillary adenopathy (arrows). (b, c) Bilateral mediolateral mammograms show large dense masses (arrow) in the right (b) and left (c) axillae. The masses are due to lymphadenopathy from secondary lymphoma. (d) Contrast-enhanced CT scan of another patient shows skin thickening with palpable large, irregular masses. The masses demonstrate poor enhancement because the image is from the arterial phase of a pulmonary embolus study.

 

Figure 5D
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5d.  Secondary lymphoma of the breast. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows bilateral marked axillary adenopathy (arrows). (b, c) Bilateral mediolateral mammograms show large dense masses (arrow) in the right (b) and left (c) axillae. The masses are due to lymphadenopathy from secondary lymphoma. (d) Contrast-enhanced CT scan of another patient shows skin thickening with palpable large, irregular masses. The masses demonstrate poor enhancement because the image is from the arterial phase of a pulmonary embolus study.

 

Figure 6A
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6a.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an irregular, peripherally enhancing, solid mass with associated skin thickening. (b, c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast (b) and US image (c) show diffuse infiltrative disease.

 

Figure 6B
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6b.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an irregular, peripherally enhancing, solid mass with associated skin thickening. (b, c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast (b) and US image (c) show diffuse infiltrative disease.

 

Figure 6C
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6c.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an irregular, peripherally enhancing, solid mass with associated skin thickening. (b, c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast (b) and US image (c) show diffuse infiltrative disease.

 

Figure 7A
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7a.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a, b) Contrast-enhanced CT scans (a obtained at a higher level than b) show an irregular, peripherally enhancing, encapsulated, fluid density mass with thick septa and adjacent skin thickening. (c, d) Mediolateral mammogram of the right breast (c) and US image (d) show concordant findings (arrows in c).

 

Figure 7B
View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7b.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a, b) Contrast-enhanced CT scans (a obtained at a higher level than b) show an irregular, peripherally enhancing, encapsulated, fluid density mass with thick septa and adjacent skin thickening. (c, d) Mediolateral mammogram of the right breast (c) and US image (d) show concordant findings (arrows in c).

 

Figure 7C
View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7c.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a, b) Contrast-enhanced CT scans (a obtained at a higher level than b) show an irregular, peripherally enhancing, encapsulated, fluid density mass with thick septa and adjacent skin thickening. (c, d) Mediolateral mammogram of the right breast (c) and US image (d) show concordant findings (arrows in c).

 

Figure 7D
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 7d.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a, b) Contrast-enhanced CT scans (a obtained at a higher level than b) show an irregular, peripherally enhancing, encapsulated, fluid density mass with thick septa and adjacent skin thickening. (c, d) Mediolateral mammogram of the right breast (c) and US image (d) show concordant findings (arrows in c).

 

Figure 8A
View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8a.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a solid, irregular, lobular mass (arrows) with surrounding edema of the breast. (b) US image shows the complex, lobulated, echogenic mass against the background of the edematous breast.

 

Figure 8B
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 8b.  Inflammatory carcinoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a solid, irregular, lobular mass (arrows) with surrounding edema of the breast. (b) US image shows the complex, lobulated, echogenic mass against the background of the edematous breast.

 

Figure 9
View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 9.  Postoperative hematoma or seroma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an irregular, peripherally enhancing mass with punctate foci of air (short arrows) and an air-fluid level (long arrow).

 

Figure 10A
View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10a.  Postoperative hematoma or seroma. (a–c) Serial nonenhanced CT scans show a round postoperative fluid collection (a) that resolves over time (b), leaving a fibrous scar (c). (d) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the irregular, spiculated, high-density mass (arrow) posterior to a linear scar marker.

 

Figure 10B
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10b.  Postoperative hematoma or seroma. (a–c) Serial nonenhanced CT scans show a round postoperative fluid collection (a) that resolves over time (b), leaving a fibrous scar (c). (d) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the irregular, spiculated, high-density mass (arrow) posterior to a linear scar marker.

 

Figure 10C
View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10c.  Postoperative hematoma or seroma. (a–c) Serial nonenhanced CT scans show a round postoperative fluid collection (a) that resolves over time (b), leaving a fibrous scar (c). (d) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the irregular, spiculated, high-density mass (arrow) posterior to a linear scar marker.

 

Figure 10D
View larger version (113K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 10d.  Postoperative hematoma or seroma. (a–c) Serial nonenhanced CT scans show a round postoperative fluid collection (a) that resolves over time (b), leaving a fibrous scar (c). (d) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the irregular, spiculated, high-density mass (arrow) posterior to a linear scar marker.

 

Figure 11A
View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11a.  Postoperative scar. (a) Nonenhanced CT scan shows a spiculated dense mass. (b) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows an area of architectural distortion (arrow) that corresponds to the site of surgical scarring.

 

Figure 11B
View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 11b.  Postoperative scar. (a) Nonenhanced CT scan shows a spiculated dense mass. (b) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows an area of architectural distortion (arrow) that corresponds to the site of surgical scarring.

 

Figure 12
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 12.  Postoperative scar. Nonenhanced CT scan shows a dense, spiculated mass in the lateral left breast.

 

Figure 13A
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13a.  Postoperative scar. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an isolated finding of a spiculated, dense mass. (c) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows architectural distortion and surgical clips (arrow) in the area of an earlier lumpectomy.

 

Figure 13B
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13b.  Postoperative scar. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an isolated finding of a spiculated, dense mass. (c) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows architectural distortion and surgical clips (arrow) in the area of an earlier lumpectomy.

 

Figure 13C
View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 13c.  Postoperative scar. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an isolated finding of a spiculated, dense mass. (c) Corresponding craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows architectural distortion and surgical clips (arrow) in the area of an earlier lumpectomy.

 

Figure 14A
View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14a.  Biopsy-proved fibroadenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an elliptical, well-defined, homogeneously enhancing mass without associated nipple retraction or skin thickening. (b) Craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows the circumscribed, lobulated, noncalcified mass (arrow). Postsurgical changes and surgical clips are seen in the retroareolar region. (c) US image shows the solid, circumscribed, parallel, hypoechoic mass.

 

Figure 14B
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14b.  Biopsy-proved fibroadenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an elliptical, well-defined, homogeneously enhancing mass without associated nipple retraction or skin thickening. (b) Craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows the circumscribed, lobulated, noncalcified mass (arrow). Postsurgical changes and surgical clips are seen in the retroareolar region. (c) US image shows the solid, circumscribed, parallel, hypoechoic mass.

 

Figure 14C
View larger version (125K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 14c.  Biopsy-proved fibroadenoma. (a) Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows an elliptical, well-defined, homogeneously enhancing mass without associated nipple retraction or skin thickening. (b) Craniocaudal mammogram of the left breast shows the circumscribed, lobulated, noncalcified mass (arrow). Postsurgical changes and surgical clips are seen in the retroareolar region. (c) US image shows the solid, circumscribed, parallel, hypoechoic mass.

 

Figure 15A
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15a.  Fibroadenolipoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an oval, circumscribed mass of mixed soft-tissue and fat density. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the fat and soft-tissue density mass with sharply defined margins.

 

Figure 15B
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15b.  Fibroadenolipoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an oval, circumscribed mass of mixed soft-tissue and fat density. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the fat and soft-tissue density mass with sharply defined margins.

 

Figure 15C
View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 15c.  Fibroadenolipoma. (a, b) Axial (a) and coronal (b) contrast-enhanced CT scans show an oval, circumscribed mass of mixed soft-tissue and fat density. (c) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows the fat and soft-tissue density mass with sharply defined margins.

 

Figure 16A
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16a.  Benign calcifications. (a–c) Axial (a, b) and coronal (c) contrast-enhanced CT scans show multiple coarse benign-appearing calcifications. (The calcifications shown in a and b are in the same breast. The one shown in a is more lateral; the one shown in b is more medial.) (d) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows several popcorn calcifications, which are consistent with hyalinized fibroadenomas.

 

Figure 16B
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16b.  Benign calcifications. (a–c) Axial (a, b) and coronal (c) contrast-enhanced CT scans show multiple coarse benign-appearing calcifications. (The calcifications shown in a and b are in the same breast. The one shown in a is more lateral; the one shown in b is more medial.) (d) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows several popcorn calcifications, which are consistent with hyalinized fibroadenomas.

 

Figure 16C
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16c.  Benign calcifications. (a–c) Axial (a, b) and coronal (c) contrast-enhanced CT scans show multiple coarse benign-appearing calcifications. (The calcifications shown in a and b are in the same breast. The one shown in a is more lateral; the one shown in b is more medial.) (d) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows several popcorn calcifications, which are consistent with hyalinized fibroadenomas.

 

Figure 16D
View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 16d.  Benign calcifications. (a–c) Axial (a, b) and coronal (c) contrast-enhanced CT scans show multiple coarse benign-appearing calcifications. (The calcifications shown in a and b are in the same breast. The one shown in a is more lateral; the one shown in b is more medial.) (d) Craniocaudal mammogram of the right breast shows several popcorn calcifications, which are consistent with hyalinized fibroadenomas.

 

Figure 17
View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 17.  Lactating breasts. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan shows symmetric hyperattenuating, linear soft-tissue densities in both breasts, an appearance consistent with engorged lactiferous glands.

 

Figure 18A
View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18a.  Breast CT lexicon: masses. CT scans show breast masses, which should be described according to their density: fat (a), air (arrow) (b), fluid (c), and soft tissue (d).

 

Figure 18B
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18b.  Breast CT lexicon: masses. CT scans show breast masses, which should be described according to their density: fat (a), air (arrow) (b), fluid (c), and soft tissue (d).

 

Figure 18C
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18c.  Breast CT lexicon: masses. CT scans show breast masses, which should be described according to their density: fat (a), air (arrow) (b), fluid (c), and soft tissue (d).

 

Figure 18D
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 18d.  Breast CT lexicon: masses. CT scans show breast masses, which should be described according to their density: fat (a), air (arrow) (b), fluid (c), and soft tissue (d).

 

Figure 19
View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 19.  Breast CT lexicon: enhancement pattern. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of an inflammatory cancer shows enhancing internal septa (A) and rim enhancement (B). After administration of contrast material, the pattern of enhancement should be characterized.

 

Figure 20
View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 20.  Breast CT lexicon: associated finding. Contrast-enhanced CT scan of an inflammatory cancer shows associated skin thickening (arrow). In addition to the breast mass, associated findings should also be mentioned.

 

Figure 21A
View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 21a.  Breast CT lexicon: calcifications. CT scans obtained with soft-tissue (a) and bone (b) windows show coarse calcifications in an involuting fibroadenoma.

 

Figure 21B
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 21b.  Breast CT lexicon: calcifications. CT scans obtained with soft-tissue (a) and bone (b) windows show coarse calcifications in an involuting fibroadenoma.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.