RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.25si055515
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murthy, R.
Right arrow Articles by Hicks, M. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Vascular and/or Interventional Radiology
Right arrow Gastrointestinal Radiology

Yttrium-90 Microsphere Therapy for Hepatic Malignancy: Devices, Indications, Technical Considerations, and Potential Complications1

Ravi Murthy, MD, Rodolfo Nunez, MD, Janio Szklaruk, MD, William Erwin, PhD, David C. Madoff, MD, Sanjay Gupta, MD, Kamran Ahrar, MD, Michael J. Wallace, MD, Alan Cohen, MD, Douglas M. Coldwell, PhD, MD2, Andrew S. Kennedy, MD and Marshall E. Hicks, MD

1 From the Interventional Radiology Section (R.M., D.C.M., S.G., K.A., M.J.W., M.E.H.) and the Departments of Nuclear Medicine (R.N.), Body Imaging (J.S.), and Imaging Physics (W.E.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 325, Houston, TX 77030; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas Hermann Hospital, Houston, Tex (A.C.); Department of Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Miss (D.M.C.); and Wake Radiation Oncology, Cary, NC (A.S.K.). Presented as an education exhibit at the 2004 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 23, 2005; revision requested April 25 and received June 7; accepted June 15. The article discusses an investigational or unlabeled use of a commercial device or pharmaceutical that has not been approved for such purpose by the FDA. The glass microsphere device (TheraSphere; MDS Nordion, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada) has received humanitarian device exemption approval from the FDA for treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and can be used only with investigational review board oversight. The resin microsphere device (SIR-Spheres; Sirtex Medical, Lake Forest, Ill) has received premarket approval from the FDA for use in combination with hepatic arterial floxuridine therapy to treat colorectal metastasis to the liver; its use in any other manner for treatment of hepatic neoplastic disease is an off-label application. R.M., A.S.K., and D.M.C. have received honoraria from Sirtex Medical; all remaining authors have no financial relationships to disclose.


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 1.  Photomicrograph (original magnification, x 200) shows glass microspheres.

 


View larger version (137K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 2.  Photomicrograph (original magnification, x 1000) shows resin microspheres.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3a.  Images obtained for therapy planning show normal anatomy in a 69-year-old man. (a) Celiac arteriogram obtained before treatment shows gastroduodenal artery (arrowhead), right gastric artery (white arrow), and hepatic artery branches (black arrows). Note that the right hepatic artery arises early in the branching of the common hepatic artery, before the origin of the gastroduodenal artery. (b, c) Arteriograms show selective catheterization and coil embolization of the right gastric artery (arrow in b) and gastroduodenal artery (arrow in c) to avert reflux and thereby decrease the risk of gastric ulcer. (d) Indirect portal venogram depicts patency of the main (arrow), left, and right portal venous branches.

 


View larger version (127K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3b.  Images obtained for therapy planning show normal anatomy in a 69-year-old man. (a) Celiac arteriogram obtained before treatment shows gastroduodenal artery (arrowhead), right gastric artery (white arrow), and hepatic artery branches (black arrows). Note that the right hepatic artery arises early in the branching of the common hepatic artery, before the origin of the gastroduodenal artery. (b, c) Arteriograms show selective catheterization and coil embolization of the right gastric artery (arrow in b) and gastroduodenal artery (arrow in c) to avert reflux and thereby decrease the risk of gastric ulcer. (d) Indirect portal venogram depicts patency of the main (arrow), left, and right portal venous branches.

 


View larger version (119K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3c.  Images obtained for therapy planning show normal anatomy in a 69-year-old man. (a) Celiac arteriogram obtained before treatment shows gastroduodenal artery (arrowhead), right gastric artery (white arrow), and hepatic artery branches (black arrows). Note that the right hepatic artery arises early in the branching of the common hepatic artery, before the origin of the gastroduodenal artery. (b, c) Arteriograms show selective catheterization and coil embolization of the right gastric artery (arrow in b) and gastroduodenal artery (arrow in c) to avert reflux and thereby decrease the risk of gastric ulcer. (d) Indirect portal venogram depicts patency of the main (arrow), left, and right portal venous branches.

 


View larger version (134K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 3d.  Images obtained for therapy planning show normal anatomy in a 69-year-old man. (a) Celiac arteriogram obtained before treatment shows gastroduodenal artery (arrowhead), right gastric artery (white arrow), and hepatic artery branches (black arrows). Note that the right hepatic artery arises early in the branching of the common hepatic artery, before the origin of the gastroduodenal artery. (b, c) Arteriograms show selective catheterization and coil embolization of the right gastric artery (arrow in b) and gastroduodenal artery (arrow in c) to avert reflux and thereby decrease the risk of gastric ulcer. (d) Indirect portal venogram depicts patency of the main (arrow), left, and right portal venous branches.

 


View larger version (115K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4a.  Images obtained for therapy planning show common anatomic variations in a 42-year-old man with bilo-bar disease, findings that resulted in alteration of the treatment plan. (a) Celiac arteriogram depicts an accessory left hepatic artery (curved arrow), which originates from the left gastric artery (straight arrow), and the splenic and common hepatic arteries (arrowheads). (b) Superior mesenteric arteriogram shows a replacement of the right hepatic artery (arrowhead) and a normal left hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization of the accessory left hepatic artery was necessary to augment intrahepatic collateral flow before treatment. A single transarterial infusion of 90Y microspheres was then administered via the proper hepatic artery to treat the entire liver.

 


View larger version (135K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 4b.  Images obtained for therapy planning show common anatomic variations in a 42-year-old man with bilo-bar disease, findings that resulted in alteration of the treatment plan. (a) Celiac arteriogram depicts an accessory left hepatic artery (curved arrow), which originates from the left gastric artery (straight arrow), and the splenic and common hepatic arteries (arrowheads). (b) Superior mesenteric arteriogram shows a replacement of the right hepatic artery (arrowhead) and a normal left hepatic artery (arrow). Embolization of the accessory left hepatic artery was necessary to augment intrahepatic collateral flow before treatment. A single transarterial infusion of 90Y microspheres was then administered via the proper hepatic artery to treat the entire liver.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 5.  Scintigraphy performed for treatment planning in a 54-year-old man with metastasis of neuroendocrine cancer to the liver. Planar scintigram obtained after hepatic arterial injection of 5 mCi (185 MBq) of 99mTc-labeled MAA shows radionuclide activity in regions of interest in the liver and lungs but not in the gastrointestinal region. The hepatopulmonary shunt fraction, calculated on the basis of scintigraphic findings, was 10.2%, and the patient therefore underwent treatment with 90Y resin microspheres at a reduced dose. Treatment was successful.

 


View larger version (111K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 6.  Photograph shows the infusion set used with the glass microsphere device. The radioactive microspheres are suspended in normal saline in a vial that is shielded by a lead pig (curved black arrow) adjacent to a separate venting vial inside another lead pig. The suspension is administered with high-pressure infusion by using an inflation device (straight black arrow) to agitate and disperse the microspheres via the efferent tubing into the catheter (white arrow).

 


View larger version (87K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.  Photograph shows the infusion set used with the resin microsphere device. The radioactive microspheres are suspended in sterile water inside a vial (curved black arrow) that is housed in a shielded container (straight black arrow). A three-way stopcock (white arrow) allows sequential infusion of the 90Y microspheres and contrast material injection for monitoring the progress of infusion.

 


View larger version (116K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 8.  Bremsstrahlung imaging helps confirm successful targeting of hepatic metastases from pancreatic islet cell tumor in a 54-year-old man. Representative axial, coronal, and sagittal CT images (first column), SPECT images (second column), and SPECT/CT fusion images (third column) obtained with a dual-modality imaging system (Hawkeye; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) show selective activity in the right hepatic lobe approximately 24 hours after intraarterial infusion of 90Y-bearing resin microspheres at a dose of 55 mCi (2035 MBq).

 


View larger version (136K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9a.  Complete response to brachytherapy with use of the resin microsphere device as an adjunct to systemic chemotherapy. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scans show numerous low-attenuation hepatic metastases before treatment (a) and absence of metastases 15 months after treatment (b). (Courtesy of Bruce Gray, MD, Sirtex Medical, Australia.)

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 9b.  Complete response to brachytherapy with use of the resin microsphere device as an adjunct to systemic chemotherapy. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scans show numerous low-attenuation hepatic metastases before treatment (a) and absence of metastases 15 months after treatment (b). (Courtesy of Bruce Gray, MD, Sirtex Medical, Australia.)

 


View larger version (125K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 10a.  Radiation-induced change in appearance of liver parenchyma on axial contrast-enhanced CT images in a 49-year-old woman who underwent treatment with the glass microsphere device for metastatic neuroendocrine cancer. (a) Image obtained before treatment shows low-attenuation regions consistent with metastases to the liver. (b) Image obtained 3 months after treatment shows areas with low attenuation (arrows) in the liver parenchyma adjacent to the metastases. Low attenuation in this case was treatment related but could be erroneously interpreted as evidence of disease progression. (Courtesy of Barry Daly, MD, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md.)

 


View larger version (110K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 10b.  Radiation-induced change in appearance of liver parenchyma on axial contrast-enhanced CT images in a 49-year-old woman who underwent treatment with the glass microsphere device for metastatic neuroendocrine cancer. (a) Image obtained before treatment shows low-attenuation regions consistent with metastases to the liver. (b) Image obtained 3 months after treatment shows areas with low attenuation (arrows) in the liver parenchyma adjacent to the metastases. Low attenuation in this case was treatment related but could be erroneously interpreted as evidence of disease progression. (Courtesy of Barry Daly, MD, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Md.)

 


View larger version (105K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11a.  Representative coronal images from two fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET examinations performed 6 months apart in a 55-year-old man who was undergoing systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. (a) Initial scan shows extensive hepatic metastases. (b) Follow-up scan obtained after liver-directed therapy with the resin microsphere device shows a marked decrease in metabolic activity in the metastatic hepatic lesions but increased metabolic activity at sites in the sternum, lungs, and left side of the groin. Local tumor control was achieved, but systemic therapy failed.

 


View larger version (84K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 11b.  Representative coronal images from two fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose whole-body PET examinations performed 6 months apart in a 55-year-old man who was undergoing systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. (a) Initial scan shows extensive hepatic metastases. (b) Follow-up scan obtained after liver-directed therapy with the resin microsphere device shows a marked decrease in metabolic activity in the metastatic hepatic lesions but increased metabolic activity at sites in the sternum, lungs, and left side of the groin. Local tumor control was achieved, but systemic therapy failed.

 


View larger version (156K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 12.  Cholecystitis and perforated duodenal ulcer in a 43-year-old man who underwent four treatments with the glass microsphere device for hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer. Photomicrograph of a gallbladder specimen (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x40) obtained at cholecystectomy performed during exploratory laparotomy shows glass microspheres (arrows) in the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses, with associated inflammation in the gallbladder wall and ulcerated duodenum.

 


View larger version (143K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13a.  Gastric ulcer in a 67-year-old man who underwent treatment with the resin microsphere device for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ulceration occurred despite prior coil embolization of the gastroduodenal artery. (a, b) Images obtained at common hepatic arteriography show a prominent gastroduodenal artery (black arrow) and a right gastric artery (white arrow) that originates from the proximal portion of the left hepatic artery (black arrowhead), a common anatomic variant. Because of the variant anatomy, infusion via the proper hepatic artery resulted in resin microsphere deposition and consequent ulceration in the stomach. (c) Photomicrograph (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x200) of a gastric biopsy specimen shows staining of resin microspheres (arrows) in the submucosa, with associated eosinophil infiltration.

 


View larger version (153K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13b.  Gastric ulcer in a 67-year-old man who underwent treatment with the resin microsphere device for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ulceration occurred despite prior coil embolization of the gastroduodenal artery. (a, b) Images obtained at common hepatic arteriography show a prominent gastroduodenal artery (black arrow) and a right gastric artery (white arrow) that originates from the proximal portion of the left hepatic artery (black arrowhead), a common anatomic variant. Because of the variant anatomy, infusion via the proper hepatic artery resulted in resin microsphere deposition and consequent ulceration in the stomach. (c) Photomicrograph (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x200) of a gastric biopsy specimen shows staining of resin microspheres (arrows) in the submucosa, with associated eosinophil infiltration.

 


View larger version (176K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 13c.  Gastric ulcer in a 67-year-old man who underwent treatment with the resin microsphere device for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ulceration occurred despite prior coil embolization of the gastroduodenal artery. (a, b) Images obtained at common hepatic arteriography show a prominent gastroduodenal artery (black arrow) and a right gastric artery (white arrow) that originates from the proximal portion of the left hepatic artery (black arrowhead), a common anatomic variant. Because of the variant anatomy, infusion via the proper hepatic artery resulted in resin microsphere deposition and consequent ulceration in the stomach. (c) Photomicrograph (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x200) of a gastric biopsy specimen shows staining of resin microspheres (arrows) in the submucosa, with associated eosinophil infiltration.

 


View larger version (123K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 14a.  Radiation-induced liver disease in a 44-year-old woman who underwent treatment for bilobar cholangiocarcinoma with 90Y-bearing resin microspheres at a total radiation dose of 50.1 mCi (1853.7 MBq). Although the blood level of CA 19–9 antigen decreased from 980.2 to 408.2 U/mL after treatment, the patient developed worsening symptoms of hepatic decompensation. (a) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan of the liver, obtained 4 weeks after treatment, shows ascites (arrow). (b) Photomicrograph (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x200) of a liver biopsy specimen obtained for histopathologic analysis depicts hepatocyte swelling, mild microvesicular steatosis (black arrows), and a resin microsphere (white arrow) without any associated inflammatory response.

 


View larger version (166K):

[in a new window]
 
Figure 14b.  Radiation-induced liver disease in a 44-year-old woman who underwent treatment for bilobar cholangiocarcinoma with 90Y-bearing resin microspheres at a total radiation dose of 50.1 mCi (1853.7 MBq). Although the blood level of CA 19–9 antigen decreased from 980.2 to 408.2 U/mL after treatment, the patient developed worsening symptoms of hepatic decompensation. (a) Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan of the liver, obtained 4 weeks after treatment, shows ascites (arrow). (b) Photomicrograph (hematoxylineosin stain; original magnification, x200) of a liver biopsy specimen obtained for histopathologic analysis depicts hepatocyte swelling, mild microvesicular steatosis (black arrows), and a resin microsphere (white arrow) without any associated inflammatory response.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.