RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kelcz, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kelcz, F.

RadioGraphics, Vol 8, 873-899, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Mammographic evaluation of the postsurgical and irradiated breast

ME Peters, MI Fagerholm, KA Scanlan, DR Voegeli and F Kelcz
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison.

Mammography is important in women who elect lumpectomy and radiation therapy for breast carcinoma: to record the preoperative state, to assess the completeness of resection, and to detect recurrences and second primaries. Mammography of these patients, however, is difficult since surgery and irradiation may cause changes simulating carcinoma. This article describes the findings in the postsurgical and irradiated breast and the difficulty of differentiating the changes from recurrent carcinoma. It also illustrates the findings in recurrences and second primaries.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. S. Hwang, K. Kinkel, L. J. Esserman, Y. Lu, N. Weidner, and N. M. Hylton
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients Diagnosed With Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ: Value in the Diagnosis of Residual Disease, Occult Invasion, and Multicentricity
Ann. Surg. Oncol., May 1, 2003; 10(4): 381 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RadiologyHome page
S. Huber, M. Wagner, M. Medl, and H. Czembirek
Benign Breast Lesions: Minimally Invasive Vacuum-assisted Biopsy with 11-Gauge Needles—Patient Acceptance and Effect on Follow-up Imaging Findings
Radiology, March 1, 2003; 226(3): 783 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Frei, K. Kinkel, H. M. Bonel, Y. Lu, L. J. Esserman, and N. M. Hylton
MR Imaging of the Breast in Patients with Positive Margins After Lumpectomy: Influence of the Time Interval Between Lumpectomy and MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1577 - 1584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.