RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chasen, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chasen, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Floyd, J. L.

RadioGraphics, Vol 6, 793-832, Copyright © 1986 by Radiological Society of North America


REVIEWS

Concepts in computed tomography of the thorax

MH Chasen, MJ McCarthy, JD Gilliland and JL Floyd
Department of Radiology, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, Texas.

A number of concepts in the CT evaluation of the thorax have been reviewed. The concepts have been presented through anatomic images generated on a specific CT system, but any equivalent system could have produced similar images. The important conclusions derived as a result of this review are: 1. Slice thickness, volume averaging and volume sampling are interrelated. Slice thickness and the orientation and inherent subject contrast of the anatomy to be studied usually determine the quality of the image obtained. 2. Thin section imaging (i.e., 5 mm and especially 1.5 mm) can demonstrate thoracic anatomy rarely (if ever) observed on thicker images (i.e., 10 mm). Although impractical for general analysis, thin section imaging provides insight into the potential limitations of a standard approach to thoracic evaluation. 3. CT analysis of the normal anatomy of the pericardium is incomplete. Although pathology related to the pericardium has been presented in the literature, more work is required to define: 1, the relationship, on CT, of the pericardium to structures within its confines; 2, abnormalities within the mediastinum that may affect the pericardium, and 3, lesions in the lung that may invade the mediastinum and pericardium. 4. The excellent contrast sensitivity of CT (aided by iodine infusion or bolus injection techniques and dynamic scanning) does not suffice to resolve certain problems in thoracic analysis. Extrapleural signs, the concept of invasion versus abutment, and the discrimination of benign from malignant mediastinal nodes continue to present diagnostic dilemmas in CT analysis of the thorax. 5. Interesting cases provide models for demonstrating CT pitfalls, mimics, and rarities. CT can be a valuable tool in resolving diagnostic dilemmas in some cases but creates dilemmas in others. 6. CT reformation images of the thorax can be dynamically generated on the scanner console. This hands-on technique can be a valuable tool for teaching anatomy in resident training programs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. H. Chasen
Practical Applications of Mach Band Theory in Thoracic Analysis
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 596 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1986 by the Radiological Society of North America.