HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text AVI Movies All Versions of this Article: e28v1 28/1/e28    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stepansky, F. Articles by Lee, V. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stepansky, F. Articles by Lee, V. S.

Dynamic MR Angiography of Upper Extremity Vascular Disease: Pictorial Review¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, 560 First Avenue, TCH-HW-202, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016 (F.S., E.M.H., R.R., B.T., M.K., V.S.L.), and Huntingdon Valley Orthopedics, Meadowbrook, Pa (L.E.H.). Presented as an education exhibit at the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received July 16, 2007; revision requested September 12; revision received and accepted September 27. Address correspondence to the author (email: hechte01{at}med.nyu.edu).

Unlike peripheral lower extremity vascular disease, upper extremity vascular disease is relatively uncommon. While atherosclerosis and embolic disease are the most common causes of upper extremity ischemia, a wide variety of systemic diseases and anatomic abnormalities can affect the upper extremity. Upper extremity ischemia poses a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for both clinicians and radiologists. Although history and physical examination remain the mainstays of diagnosis, imaging can be vital in confirming suspected disease and guiding treatment planning. Digital subtraction angiography is often the preferred method for detection of upper extremity vascular disease, particularly for characterization of complex arteriovenous anatomy such as in vascular malformations and for evaluation of dialysis fistulas and grafts. However, this modality is invasive, requires iodinated contrast agents and radiation, and may fail to demonstrate significant extraluminal disease. More recently, magnetic resonance (MR) angiography techniques have made important advances, permitting higher temporal and spatial resolution that is preferable for diagnosing upper extremity vascular disorders. In this review, the authors present an overview of upper extremity MR angiography techniques and protocols, revisit the often variable vascular anatomy of the arm and hand, and offer examples of various pathologic entities diagnosed with MR angiography. Finally, several imaging pitfalls that one must be aware of for accurate diagnosis are illustrated and reviewed.