RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.281075047
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Körner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmaier, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Körner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmaier, U.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ultrasound
Right arrow Emergency Radiology
Right arrowRelated Article
RadioGraphics 2008;28:225-242
© RSNA, 2008


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Current Role of Emergency US in Patients with Major Trauma1

Markus Körner, MD, Michael M. Krötz, MD, Christoph Degenhart, MD, Klaus-Jürgen Pfeifer, MD, Maximilian F. Reiser, MD, and Ulrich Linsenmaier, MD

1 From the Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Munich, Nussbaumstr 20, 80336 Munich, Germany. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 16, 2007; revision requested April 11 and received May 29; accepted June 8. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to M.K. (e-mail: markus.koerner{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).

In patients with major trauma, focused abdominal ultrasonography (US) often is the initial imaging examination. US is readily available, requires minimal preparation time, and may be performed with mobile equipment that allows greater flexibility in patient positioning than is possible with other modalities. It also is effective in depicting abnormally large intraperitoneal collections of free fluid, which are indirect evidence of a solid organ injury that requires immediate surgery. However, because US has poor sensitivity for the detection of most solid organ injuries, an initial survey with US often is followed by a more thorough examination with multidetector computed tomography (CT). The initial US examination is generally performed with a FAST (focused assessment with sonography in trauma) protocol. Speed is important because if intraabdominal bleeding is present, the probability of death increases by about 1% for every 3 minutes that elapses before intervention. Typical sites of fluid accumulation in the presence of a solid organ injury are the Morison pouch (liver laceration), the pouch of Douglas (intraperitoneal rupture of the urinary bladder), and the splenorenal fossa (splenic and renal injuries). FAST may be used also to exclude injuries to the heart and pericardium but not those to the bowel, mesentery, and urinary bladder, a purpose for which multidetector CT is better suited. If there is time after the initial FAST survey, the US examination may be extended to extraabdominal regions to rule out pneumothorax or to guide endotracheal intubation, vascular puncture, or other interventional procedures.

© RSNA, 2008


Related Article

Invited Commentary Author’s Response
Stuart E. Mirvis and Markus Körner
RadioGraphics 2008 28: 241-244. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
S. E. Mirvis and M. Korner
Invited Commentary * Author's Response
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2008; 28(1): 241 - 244.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2008 by the Radiological Society of North America.