RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.27si075512
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Da Costa, D.
Right arrow Articles by Esserman, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Da Costa, D.
Right arrow Articles by Esserman, L. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Breast (Imaging and Interventional)
Right arrow Oncologic Imaging
RadioGraphics 2007;27:S65-S77
© RSNA, 2007

Common and Unusual Diseases of the Nipple-Areolar Complex1

Darlene Da Costa, MD, Abraha Taddese, MD, PhD, Marina Luz Cure, MD, Deborah Gerson, MD, Robert Poppiti, Jr, MD, and Lisa E. Esserman, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 4300 Alton Rd, Miami Beach, FL 33140. Recipient of an Excellence in Design award for an education exhibit at the 2006 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received March 9, 2007; revision requested May 1 and received July 6; accepted July 18. L.E.E. is a consultant with Ethicon Endo-Surgery; all remaining authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to D.D.C. (e-mail: dpcosta{at}bellsouth.net).

The nipple-areolar complex is often best evaluated as a separate region of the breast. Because of the intricacy of the anatomic structures and their superficial position, the diagnostic techniques required for optimal evaluation of the nipple-areolar complex differ from those routinely used to evaluate the whole breast. Although clinical examination and screening mammography are still of central importance, the adjunct use of multiple imaging modalities (ultrasonography, contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, or both) as well as nonstandard mammographic views is often necessary to differentiate benign abnormalities from malignant ones. For accurate diagnosis, familiarity with a wide range of appearances of the normal anatomy, including congenital anomalies (eg, supernumerary nipples), is necessary, as is a thorough knowledge of the features of the benign and malignant processes that commonly occur in the nipple-areolar complex. Benign abnormalities may include mammary duct ectasia, nipple calcifications, cutaneous horn of the nipple, abscess of the Montgomery gland, and nipple adenoma. Malignant abnormalities may include Paget disease and primary lymphoma as well as carcinoma of the breast. Some conditions, such as nipple retraction and inversion, may have either a benign or a malignant cause. In such cases, a thorough radiologic assessment is especially important.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
A. K. Jeong, H. J. Cha, B. K. Ko, S. B. Park, B. S. Kang, W. J. Kwon, J. C. Hwang, and J. H. Lee
Primary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast Involving the Nipple-Areolar Complex
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2008; 27(9): 1401 - 1405.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.