RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.275065737
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, Q.
Right arrow Articles by Tian, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Cardiac Radiology
Right arrow Chest Radiology
RadioGraphics 2007;27:1311-1321
© RSNA, 2007


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Three-dimensional Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of Aortic Dissection: A Pictorial Essay1

Qi Liu, MD, Jian Ping Lu, MD, Fei Wang, MD, Li Wang, MD, and Jian Min Tian, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital/2nd Military Med University, 174 Changhai Rd, Shanghai, Shanghai 200433, China. Received October 18, 2006; revision requested February 2, 2007; revision received March 8; accepted March 12. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to Q.L. (e-mail: zzliuk{at}online.sh.cn).

Aortic dissection is a catastrophic aortic disorder with high morbidity and mortality rates. Prognosis and treatment vary with different types of aortic dissection; therefore, prompt and accurate diagnosis is essential. Ultrasonography is widely available and can be used even in relatively unstable patients. However, it has limited diagnostic accuracy and cannot provide three-dimensional (3D) display images for treatment planning. Both computed tomographic (CT) angiography and 3D contrast material–enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography can accurately demonstrate aortic dissection, with CT having the advantages of wider availability and shorter imaging times. However, contrast-enhanced MR angiography is more suitable in medically stable patients, does not involve nephrotoxic contrast agent or ionizing radiation, and offers greater ease and speed of postprocessing. In clinical practice, contrast-enhanced MR angiography can provide high-quality imaging data suitable for 3D reconstructions. It also has excellent spatial and contrast resolution and allows studies to be performed in multiple vascular phases, making it valuable for the diagnosis and classification of aortic dissection and in providing information that is helpful for treatment planning. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography with postprocessing is a fast, accurate, and noninvasive technique that may prove to be the optimal imaging modality in medically stable patients with aortic dissection.

© RSNA, 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Q. Liu, J. P. Lu, F. Wang, L. Wang, A. G. Jin, J. Wang, and J. M. Tian
Visceral Artery Aneurysms: Evaluation Using 3D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2008; 191(3): 826 - 833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2007 by the Radiological Society of North America.