HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ho, Y. Y. Articles by Wang, S.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ho, Y. Y. Articles by Wang, S.-C. Related Collections Magnetic Resonance Imaging Musculoskeletal Radiology Related Article

Postoperative Evaluation of the Knee after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation: What Radiologists Need to Know¹

¹ From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Hospital of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore 119074. Presented as an education exhibit at the 2005 RSNA Annual Meeting. Received April 17, 2006; revision requested May 11 and received May 30; accepted May 31. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to Y.Y.H. (e-mail: Yvonne_Ho{at}nuh.com.sg).

Articular cartilage lesions occur commonly. Cartilage is relatively avascular and is unable to self-repair. A chondral lesion may become symptomatic. It may lead to osteoarthritis and increased morbidity. The aim of cartilage repair is to restore hyaline cartilage. There are many types of cartilage repair surgery, most of which result in fibrocartilage repair tissue that is suboptimal. Autologous chondrocyte implantation has been shown to produce hyaline-type repair tissue. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is performed preoperatively to define the ulcer and postoperatively to evaluate the technical success of implantation and the state of cartilage healing and to identify potential complications. Features of the autologous chondrocyte implantation graft that are assessed include the degree of filling by repair tissue, its integration with native cartilage and subchondral bone, the character of the graft substance and surface, and the underlying bone. MR arthrography is superior to unenhanced MR imaging because intraarticular contrast material allows the recipient site to be physically separated from adjacent structures so that it can be characterized more accurately. MR imaging and arthroscopy are complementary investigations in the follow-up of an autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee. The appearance of the knee after autologous chondrocyte implantation varies among individuals and according to the time-course of healing. Familiarity with the surgical procedure and imaging appearance is essential for an accurate postsurgical assessment.

© RSNA, 2007

Related Article

Invited Commentary • Authors’ Response

David G. Disler, Yvonne Yiwan Ho, Anthony Joseph Stanley, James Hoi-Po Hui, and Shih-Chang Wang
RadioGraphics 2007 27: 221-222. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Y. S. Choi, H. G. Potter, and T. J. Chun MR Imaging of Cartilage Repair in the Knee and Ankle RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1043 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]