HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Merkle, E. M. Articles by Nelson, R. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Merkle, E. M. Articles by Nelson, R. C. Related Collections Magnetic Resonance Imaging Gastrointestinal Radiology

Dual Gradient-Echo In-Phase and Opposed-Phase Hepatic MR Imaging: A Useful Tool for Evaluating More Than Fatty Infiltration or Fatty Sparing¹

¹ From the Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North, Room 1417, Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710. Received May 6, 2005; revision requested July 25 and received August 15; accepted August 15. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to E.M.M. (e-mail: elmar.merkle{at}duke.edu).

A T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase sequence has become a routine part of every hepatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol. Although this sequence is primarily used to identify common pathologic conditions, such as diffuse or focal steatosis and focal fatty sparing, it is also helpful in detection of pathologic entities associated with T2* effects owing to the double-echo approach. Thus, pathologic conditions such as hemochromatosis or hemosiderosis can be identified and characterized with a high level of confidence. In cases of iron storage disease, the hepatic parenchymal signal intensity decreases on the image with the longer echo time due to the continued decay of the transverse magnetization. In addition, susceptibility artifacts can be easily detected and characterized with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging. Metallic objects demonstrate a larger susceptibility artifact on the image with the second or longer echo time, which is usually the in-phase image. Finally, intrahepatic pneumobilia can be identified with the T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase sequence because gas also causes a susceptibility artifact, which is more pronounced on the image with the longer echo time. A complete understanding of both the chemical shift cancellation artifact and the T2* effects of the in-phase and opposed-phase sequence is important for correct interpretation of hepatic MR images.

© RSNA, 2006

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. T. Schindera, B. J. Soher, D. M. Delong, B. M. Dale, and E. M. Merkle Effect of Echo Time Pair Selection on Quantitative Analysis for Adrenal Tumor Characterization with In-Phase and Opposed-Phase MR Imaging: Initial Experience Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 140 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Willatt, H. K. Hussain, S. Adusumilli, and J. A. Marrero MR Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Challenges and Controversies Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 311 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Macari, R. Yeretsian, and J. Babb Assessment of Low Signal Adjacent to the Falciform Ligament on Contrast-Enhanced MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2007; 189(6): 1443 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]