RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.255045713
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgaertner, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daftary, A.
Right arrow Articles by Baumgaertner, M. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Musculoskeletal Radiology
Right arrow Computed Tomography
RadioGraphics 2005;25:1215-1226
© RSNA, 2005


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Fractures of the Calcaneus: A Review with Emphasis on CT1

Aditya Daftary, MB, BS, Andrew H. Haims, MD and Michael R. Baumgaertner, MD

1 From the Departments of Radiology (A.D., A.H.H.) and Orthopedic Surgery (M.R.B.), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, Box 208042, New Haven, CT 06520-8042. Received June 23, 2004; revision requested August 5; final revision received December 16; accepted December 17. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to A.H.H. (e-mail: Andrew.haims{at}yale.edu)

The calcaneus is the most commonly fractured tarsal bone and accounts for about 2% of all fractures. Advances in cross-sectional imaging, particularly in computed tomography (CT), have given this modality an important role in identifying and characterizing calcaneal fractures. Fracture characterization is essential to guide the management of these injuries. Calcaneal fractures have characteristic appearances based on the mechanism of injury and are divided into two major groups, intraarticular and extraarticular. Most calcaneal fractures (70%–75%) are intraarticular and result from axial loading that produces shear and compression fracture lines. Of the two major systems for classifying intraarticular fractures–Hannover and Sanders–the latter is used most often and is helpful in treatment planning and determining prognosis. Extraarticular fractures account for about 25%–30% of calcaneal fractures and include all fractures that do not involve the posterior facet. The article describes in detail calcaneal anatomy, mechanism of calcaneal injuries and their associated fracture patterns, CT features of intra- and extraarticular fractures, and management implications. Familiarity with calcaneal anatomy and fracture patterns is essential for radiologists to guide the treating physicians.

© RSNA, 2005







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.