RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.253045124
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME Test (opens in a new window)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McNamara, A.
Right arrow Articles by Levine, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetric/Gynecologic Radiology
Right arrow Ultrasound
RadioGraphics 2005;25:633-645
© RSNA, 2005


EDUCATION EXHIBIT

Intraabdominal Fetal Echogenic Masses: A Practical Guide to Diagnosis and Management1

Ann McNamara, MB, FFR (RCSI) and Deborah Levine, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215. Recipient of a Certificate of Merit award and an Excellence in Design award for an education exhibit at the 2002 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received June 3, 2004; revision requested August 5 and received September 2; accepted September 8. All authors have no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to D.L. (e-mail: dlevine{at}bidmc.harvard.edu).

Intraabdominal calcifications and other echogenic masses are relatively common findings during fetal sonography. Many are associated with no additional risk for the fetus or neonate. They may arise from the liver, gallbladder, spleen, kidneys, adrenal glands, gastrointestinal tract, or peritoneal cavity. Detection of such lesions should prompt a detailed survey for additional findings and a review of the maternal history. In some cases, fetal karyotyping may be indicated. In most cases, the diagnosis, management, and outcome are determined according to a combination of specific ultrasound appearances and at least one additional maternal or fetal factor. In utero diagnosis can often be achieved with careful evaluation of the lesion echotexture, associated calcifications, additional findings, and evolution over time. In most cases, expectant management is sufficient, but some patients require transfer to a facility where early postnatal intervention is available. A systematic approach to the findings aids in differential diagnosis and management.

© RSNA, 2005







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.