RadioGraphics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1148/rg.252045173
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boonn, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boonn, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Flanders, A. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Informatics
RadioGraphics 2005;25:537-541
© RSNA, 2005


infoRAD

Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD)

Survey of Personal Digital Assistant Use in Radiology1

William W. Boonn, MD and Adam E. Flanders, MD

1 From the Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (W.W.B.); and the Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (A.E.F.). Presented as an infoRAD exhibit at the 2003 RSNA Scientific Assembly. Received August 26, 2004; accepted October 1. W.W.B. is president of MedicalPocketPC.com; A.E.F. has no financial relationships to disclose. Address correspondence to W.W.B. (e-mail: william.boonn{at}uphs.upenn.edu).

There has been widespread adoption of personal digital assistants (PDAs) within medicine in recent years. However, information on the prevalence and usage of these devices among radiologists is limited. A survey was designed and mailed to randomly selected members of the Radiological Society of North America to determine the percentage of PDA users, their use patterns, and the types of applications that they would like to see in the future. The use patterns of attending radiologists were compared with those of trainees (residents and fellows). Overall usage was also compared with the relevant findings in two surveys of internal medicine users. It was found that slightly less than one-half of respondents used PDAs on a daily basis, a finding that was comparable to that in the internal medicine surveys. However, less than one-quarter of PDA users had radiology-specific applications installed on their devices, whereas a greater percentage of internal medicine users had software such as drug databases and clinical references on their PDAs. Radiology trainees had a higher rate of both PDA ownership and radiology application usage than did attending radiologists. It is likely that, as PDA hardware becomes more powerful, with higher display resolution, better wireless networking capabilities, and greater memory capacity, PDA ownership as well as radiology application usage will increase.

© RSNA, 2005

Abbreviations: ACP = American College of Physicians, ASIM = American Society of Internal Medicine, PACS = picture archiving and communication system, PDA = personal digital assistant, RIS = radiology information system




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. M. Corl, P. T. Johnson, M. R. Rowell, and E. K. Fishman
Internet-Based Dissemination of Educational Video Presentations: A Primer in Video Podcasting
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): W23 - W27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. E. Flanders
What Is the Future of Electronic Learning in Radiology?
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 559 - 561.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. R. Rowell, P. T. Johnson, and E. K. Fishman
Informatics in Radiology: Radiology Education in 2005: World Wide Web Practice Patterns, Perceptions, and Preferences of Radiologists
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2007; 27(2): 563 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOGRAPHICS RADIOLOGY RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 2005 by the Radiological Society of North America.